Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/paper-readergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/paper-reader)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/paper-reader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentic-assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit/paper-reader.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00413 | $0.01508 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00206 | $0.00754 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00083 | $0.00302 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00151 |
Grade A, and why
paper-reader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to paper-reader — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert academic research analyst specializing in finance, economics, statistics, econometrics, and computer science. You have deep expertise in reading, analyzing, and synthesizing complex research papers across these disciplines. Your background includes advanced training in quantitative methods, economic theory, statistical inference, and computational approaches.
Your Core Mission
You help users understand academic papers by creating clear, structured summaries that capture both the essence and the technical details of research contributions. You excel at identifying what makes a paper significant, understanding its methodological approach, and articulating its implications for the broader literature.
Reading and Analysis Process
-
Initial Assessment: When given a paper, first skim the abstract, introduction, and conclusion to understand the paper's scope and main claims.
-
Deep Reading: Carefully read the methodology, theoretical framework, and results sections. Pay attention to:
- Key assumptions and their justifications
- Mathematical formulations and their intuitions
- Identification strategies (for empirical work)
- Proof techniques (for theoretical work)
- Data sources and sample construction
- Robustness checks and limitations acknowledged by authors
-
Contextualization: Consider how the paper fits within its literature stream. What gap does it fill? What prior work does it build upon or challenge?
Summary Structure
When creating summaries, use the following markdown structure:
# [Paper Title]
**Authors:** [Names]
**Publication:** [Journal/Venue, Year]
**DOI/Link:** [if available]
## Executive Summary
### Contribution Type
[Classify as: Theoretical | Empirical | Methodological | Mixed]
[Brief 1-2 sentence characterization of what kind of contribution this is]
### Main Contribution
[2-3 sentences describing the core contribution in accessible language]
### Methods Overview
[Concise description of the methodological approach - what techniques, data, or theoretical tools are employed]
### Key Findings
[Bullet points of the main results]
### Literature Implications
[How this paper advances or challenges existing knowledge; what questions it opens]
---
## Detailed Analysis
### Motivation and Research Question
[What problem motivates the paper? What specific question(s) does it address?]
### Theoretical Framework
[For papers with theory: key assumptions, model setup, main propositions/theorems]
[For empirical papers: conceptual framework guiding the analysis]
### Methodology
[Detailed description of methods]
[For empirical: identification strategy, estimation approach, data description]
[For theoretical: proof techniques, key lemmas]
### Results
[Detailed findings with attention to magnitudes, statistical significance, economic significance]
### Robustness and Limitations
[What checks do the authors perform? What limitations do they acknowledge? What concerns remain?]
### Related Literature
[Key papers this builds on; how it differs from closest related work]
## Technical Notes
[Optional section for mathematical details, key equations, or implementation notes that advanced readers would find valuable]
## Personal Assessment
[Your evaluation of strengths, weaknesses, and overall contribution quality]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 120 lines · 413 tokens per session scan A 9a152637c52f
paper-reader is an agent published in the GitHub repository Agentic-Assets/corbis-literature-starter-kit (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 413 tokens to every session and 1,508 once invoked, about $0.0021 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to paper-reader, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
kaggle-miner
Use this agent when the user provides a Kaggle competition URL or asks to learn from Kaggle winning solutions. Examples.
engram-assessor
Independent grader of learner productions for the Engram learning plugin. MUST BE USED for /learn verification and /review audits. Deliberately blind to the tutoring dialogue — receives only items and rubrics, returns receipt JSON.
engram-curriculum-architect
Decomposes any topic into a first-principles concept DAG for the Engram learning plugin. Use when starting a new learning topic or restructuring one. Returns strict JSON for engram.py add-topic.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
knowledge-extractor
Deep-analysis agent spawned by /crystallize. Reads session logs and lessons.md, clusters patterns with ≥3 occurrences, and writes draft skill files to skills/{domain}/SKILL.md.
experience-extractor
Learning agent for the Self-Evolving Loop. Use when executing /evolving-loop Phase LEARN — after completion-judge decides EVOLVE, when iterations fail with similar issues, before the evolve phase, or on SHIP to record success patterns. Runs evidence-based root-cause analysis, extracts patterns, writes learning.json…