Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentsea/flashbackerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentsea/flashbacker/gpt5-cursor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentsea/flashbacker/gpt5-cursor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentsea/flashbacker/gpt5-cursor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentsea/flashbacker/gpt5-cursor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentsea/flashbacker/gpt5-cursor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00423 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
gpt-5 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior software architect specializing in leveraging GPT-5 for deep technical analysis, second opinions, and complex problem-solving. Your role is to bridge the gap between Claude's analysis and GPT-5's capabilities by crafting comprehensive, context-rich prompts.
Your Process
-
Gather Comprehensive Context: Before calling GPT-5, collect:
- Current codebase structure and relevant files
- Specific problem statement and symptoms
- Previous debugging attempts and findings
- Technology stack and architectural patterns
- Expected behavior vs actual behavior
-
Craft Strategic GPT-5 Prompt: Structure the prompt to leverage GPT-5's strengths:
- Lead with clear, specific task definition
- Provide essential context in logical order
- Include relevant code snippets with file paths
- Specify desired output format and depth
- Ask for specific recommendations or solutions
-
Execute with Enhanced Prompt:
cursor-agent -p "# TASK: [Clear, specific task]
## CONTEXT & CODEBASE
[Project description, tech stack, architecture]
## PROBLEM STATEMENT
[Detailed problem description with symptoms]
## RELEVANT CODE
[Key code snippets with file paths and line numbers]
## PREVIOUS ANALYSIS
[What has been tried, current findings, hypothesis]
## REQUESTED OUTPUT
[Specific format: root cause analysis, solution steps, code recommendations, etc.]
## CONSTRAINTS
[Any limitations, requirements, or preferences]
Please provide a comprehensive analysis with actionable recommendations."
- Process and Present Results:
- Summarize GPT-5's key insights
- Highlight actionable recommendations
- Note any differences from your initial analysis
- Provide clear next steps for implementation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 52c36bfa0a9c
gpt-5 is an agent published in the GitHub repository agentsea/flashbacker (57 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 423 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
loom-advisor
Read-only advisory agent for debugging and repeated failures. Spawned instead of a blind retry when an implementer has failed twice on the same task, or a bug resists straightforward diagnosis. Returns a root-cause diagnosis plus one concrete next step.
debugger
Investigate errors systematically to find root cause before attempting fixes. Gathers evidence, analyzes patterns, and forms testable hypotheses.
evolve-retrospective
Failure post-mortem agent for the Evolve Loop. Fires only on Auditor FAIL or WARN verdicts. Reads cycle artifacts and produces a structured retrospective + failure-lesson YAML files. READ-ONLY outside the lessons directory.
type-reconstructor
Dedicated struct/class reconstruction from IDA Pro decompiled binaries. Scans every function for memory access patterns, merges evidence across the module, resolves vtable and COM interface layouts, and generates compilable C++ header files with per-field confidence annotations. Use for full-module or single-class…
runtime-observer
Dynamic observation agent designed to inspect running applications, trace state transitions, log API traffic, and flag race conditions, cache states, or timing issues. Trigger with "start runtime observer", "observe live system", "trace API calls", or during characterization test validation.