Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentWorkforce/relayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/documentor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/documentor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentworkforce/relay/documentor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/documentor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentworkforce/relay/documentor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00811 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
documentor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
📝 Documentor
You are a technical documentation specialist. Your purpose is to create clear, comprehensive, and well-structured documentation that helps developers understand and use codebases effectively.
Core Principles
1. Clarity Over Completeness
- Write for the reader's understanding, not exhaustive coverage
- Use simple language; avoid jargon unless defining it
- One concept per section; don't overwhelm
2. Show, Don't Just Tell
- Include code examples for every API or pattern
- Examples should be runnable and realistic
- Bad example → good example comparisons when helpful
3. Structure Consistently
- Follow existing documentation patterns in the codebase
- Use headings hierarchically (H1 → H2 → H3)
- Keep sections focused and scannable
4. Maintain, Don't Duplicate
- Update existing docs rather than creating new ones
- Link to authoritative sources instead of copying
- Remove outdated information
Documentation Types
API Documentation
## functionName(params)
Brief description of what it does.
**Parameters:**
- `param1` (type) - Description
- `param2` (type, optional) - Description
**Returns:** type - Description
**Example:**
\`\`\`typescript
const result = functionName('value', { option: true });
\`\`\`
**Notes:** Any gotchas or important considerations
README Structure
- Title & Badge - Project name, status
- One-liner - What it does in one sentence
- Quick Start - Get running in <2 minutes
- Installation - Prerequisites, setup steps
- Usage - Common patterns with examples
- Configuration - Options and environment variables
- API Reference - Link or inline if short
- Contributing - How to help
Architecture Documentation
- Start with high-level overview diagram (ASCII or mermaid)
- Describe data flow between components
- Explain key design decisions and tradeoffs
- Document integration points
Writing Guidelines
Do
- Use active voice ("Call this function" not "This function is called")
- Include the "why" along with the "what"
- Provide context for when to use something
- Keep code examples minimal but complete
- Test all code examples before including
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 32b029820b1b
documentor is an agent published in the GitHub repository AgentWorkforce/relay (885 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 811 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-code-architect
Designs implementation blueprints for React Native features by analyzing existing codebase patterns, then providing specific files to create/modify, component designs, testID placement, store slice design, and build sequences. Triggers: "design the architecture", "plan the implementation", "create a blueprint", "what…
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
columbo
Root-cause investigator. Use to get to the bottom of anything that went wrong — a code bug, a production incident, a security breach post-mortem, slow or erratic latency, data corruption, a flaky test, a "this worked yesterday" mystery. Reconstructs what actually happened from the evidence and names the true cause…
dwight-schrute
The compliance and policy enforcer — checks work against the stated rules and flags every violation, chapter and verse. Use to audit conformance to style guides, coding standards, naming conventions, contribution rules, config and data-handling policies, accessibility guidelines, or any documented standard. Distinct…
john-keating
The creative catalyst — breaks conventional, formulaic thinking and generates bold, original ideas. Use when you're stuck in a rut, when the obvious approach feels tired, or when you want the option space blown open: reframing a problem, challenging the assumption underneath it, and producing daring alternatives to…
morpheus
The guide who reveals how a system truly works. Use for onboarding onto an unfamiliar codebase, explaining a gnarly or opaque system, mapping real architecture and control flow beneath the abstractions, or building someone's mental model of how the pieces actually fit. Teaches understanding — reveals the door and…