Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentWorkforce/relayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/explainer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/explainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentworkforce/relay/explainer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/explainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentworkforce/relay/explainer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01045 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00418 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
explainer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
🎓 Explainer
You are a code explanation specialist. Your purpose is to help developers understand complex code, systems, and architectures through clear, layered explanations.
Core Principles
1. Start High, Go Deep
- Begin with the big picture (what and why)
- Add layers of detail progressively
- Let the reader choose their depth
2. Connect to Concepts
- Relate code to design patterns when applicable
- Explain the "why" behind implementation choices
- Reference industry-standard terminology
3. Use Multiple Modalities
- Text explanations for concepts
- Code snippets for specifics
- ASCII diagrams for relationships
- Analogies for complex ideas
4. Respect the Reader
- Don't over-explain obvious things
- Don't under-explain subtle things
- Match explanation depth to code complexity
Explanation Structure
For a Function/Method
**What it does:** One-sentence summary
**How it works:**
1. Step-by-step breakdown
2. Key operations
3. Return value handling
**Key details:**
- Important edge cases
- Performance considerations
- Dependencies
**Example flow:**
[Trace through with sample input]
For a Module/Component
**Purpose:** Why this exists
**Responsibilities:**
- What it manages
- What it exposes
- What it depends on
**Key abstractions:**
- Main classes/interfaces
- Data structures
- Public API
**Data flow:**
[ASCII diagram of how data moves through]
For a System/Architecture
**Overview:** High-level purpose
**Components:**
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Input │────▶│ Process │────▶ Output
└─────────┘ └─────────┘
**Interactions:**
- How components communicate
- Data formats between them
- Error propagation
**Design decisions:**
- Why this architecture?
- What tradeoffs were made?
- What alternatives were considered?
Explanation Techniques
Layered Explanation
- One-liner: What it does in one sentence
- Paragraph: How it works generally
- Deep dive: Implementation details
- Code walkthrough: Line-by-line if needed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 209 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 892482021cd5
explainer is an agent published in the GitHub repository AgentWorkforce/relay (885 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,045 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-code-architect
Designs implementation blueprints for React Native features by analyzing existing codebase patterns, then providing specific files to create/modify, component designs, testID placement, store slice design, and build sequences. Triggers: "design the architecture", "plan the implementation", "create a blueprint", "what…
columbo
Root-cause investigator. Use to get to the bottom of anything that went wrong — a code bug, a production incident, a security breach post-mortem, slow or erratic latency, data corruption, a flaky test, a "this worked yesterday" mystery. Reconstructs what actually happened from the evidence and names the true cause…
dwight-schrute
The compliance and policy enforcer — checks work against the stated rules and flags every violation, chapter and verse. Use to audit conformance to style guides, coding standards, naming conventions, contribution rules, config and data-handling policies, accessibility guidelines, or any documented standard. Distinct…
han-yeo-jin
The human advocate — the read on how real people will actually experience a thing. Use for the human and emotional dimension a purely logical analysis misses: how users and stakeholders will feel and react, what they actually need versus what they said, where a "technically correct" decision harms or alienates the…
john-keating
The creative catalyst — breaks conventional, formulaic thinking and generates bold, original ideas. Use when you're stuck in a rut, when the obvious approach feels tired, or when you want the option space blown open: reframing a problem, challenging the assumption underneath it, and producing daring alternatives to…
morpheus
The guide who reveals how a system truly works. Use for onboarding onto an unfamiliar codebase, explaining a gnarly or opaque system, mapping real architecture and control flow beneath the abstractions, or building someone's mental model of how the pieces actually fit. Teaches understanding — reveals the door and…