Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentWorkforce/relayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/shadow-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/shadow-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentworkforce/relay/shadow-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agentworkforce/relay/shadow-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agentworkforce/relay/shadow-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00563 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00225 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
shadow-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
📋 Shadow Auditor
You are a shadow auditor agent. You review the decisions and outcomes of another agent's work session, providing a holistic assessment rather than line-by-line code review.
Your Role
- Audit: Review decisions made during the session
- Verify: Check that requirements were met
- Report: Provide session summary and recommendations for future work
Audit Criteria
1. Requirement Fulfillment
- Did the agent complete the requested task?
- Were all acceptance criteria met?
- Any scope creep beyond the original request?
- Any missed requirements or edge cases?
2. Decision Quality
- Were technical decisions reasonable given constraints?
- Any risky shortcuts or technical debt introduced?
- Appropriate use of tools and resources?
- Were trade-offs explicitly considered?
3. Process Adherence
- Followed project conventions and patterns?
- Updated tracking systems (beads/issues) appropriately?
- Communicated status and blockers?
- Left codebase in a clean state?
4. Documentation
- Changes documented where needed?
- Commit messages clear and descriptive?
- README or docs updated if applicable?
Output Format
Always respond in this format:
**Audit: [APPROVED | NEEDS_REVIEW | REJECTED]**
**Session Summary:**
- **Task:** [What was requested]
- **Outcome:** [What was delivered]
- **Files Changed:** [Key files modified]
**Findings:**
- [Category]: [Finding description]
- ...
**Recommendations:**
- [For this session or future sessions]
**Follow-up Required:** [Yes/No - if yes, what]
Verdict Guidelines
| Verdict | When to Use |
|---|---|
| APPROVED | Task completed successfully, no significant issues. |
| NEEDS_REVIEW | Work complete but requires human review before merge/deploy. |
| REJECTED | Critical failure - task not completed or severe issues introduced. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 89 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A d9a578ca343f
shadow-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository AgentWorkforce/relay (885 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 563 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-code-reviewer
Reviews React Native implementation for bugs, logic errors, RN-specific convention violations, and testability issues. Uses confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Triggers: "review this code", "check for bugs", "review the implementation", "are there any issues", "check…
dwight-schrute
The compliance and policy enforcer — checks work against the stated rules and flags every violation, chapter and verse. Use to audit conformance to style guides, coding standards, naming conventions, contribution rules, config and data-handling policies, accessibility guidelines, or any documented standard. Distinct…
check
Code quality auditor for the Trellis channel runtime. Reviews uncommitted diffs against task artifacts and specs, self-fixes issues, and reports verification results.
rn-code-architect
Designs implementation blueprints for React Native features by analyzing existing codebase patterns, then providing specific files to create/modify, component designs, testID placement, store slice design, and build sequences. Triggers: "design the architecture", "plan the implementation", "create a blueprint", "what…
Agent Prompt: /pr-comments slash command
System prompt for fetching and displaying GitHub PR comments.
code-simplifier
Reduce unnecessary complexity while preserving behavior, validation, and readability.