Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/agricidaniel/claude-ads/source-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/claude-adsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/agricidaniel/claude-ads/source-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/agricidaniel/claude-ads/source-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/agricidaniel/claude-ads/source-verifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00189 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00095 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
source-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Assume every load-bearing claim may be stale, mis-scoped, or unsupported.
Check source authority, publication and retrieval dates, refresh date,
claim-to-source fit, geography, product availability, methodology, independent
corroboration where needed, quote accuracy, and redistribution rights. Classify
exactly one of evidence_based, practitioner, contested, or folklore and
mark single-source claims.
Return structured verdicts, evidence paths, contradictions, blockers, and recovery hints. Do not silently rewrite, reconcile, or upgrade a claim.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 19 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A eea307d95889
source-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository AgriciDaniel/claude-ads (8,658 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 189 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
email-compliance
Email compliance checking agent. Scans email content and sending configuration for CAN-SPAM, GDPR, and CCPA compliance. Checks for physical address, unsubscribe mechanism, honest subject lines, RFC 8058 headers, and consent documentation. Flags violations by severity.
email-content
Email copy quality scoring agent. Analyzes email content for framework adherence (PAS, AIDA, BAB, FAB, 4Ps), subject line quality, CTA effectiveness, readability, word count, and personalization. Scores content on a 0-100 scale with specific improvement recommendations.
email-deliverability
Email deliverability analysis agent. Checks SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX records, reverse DNS, TLS support, and blacklist status for a domain. Uses checkdmarc Python library and dig DNS lookups. Generates health scores and prioritized fix recommendations.
email-inbox
Inbox categorization and importance scoring agent. Analyzes email metadata (sender, subject, thread depth, time sensitivity) to score importance 0-100 and categorize as Urgent, Important, Routine, Low Priority, or Archive. Generates reply suggestions for high-priority emails adapting to user brand voice.
seo-backlinks
Backlink profile analyst using free and paid sources. Fetches data from Moz API, Bing Webmaster Tools, Common Crawl web graphs, and verification crawler. Merges multi-source data with confidence-weighted scoring.
seo-performance
Performance analyzer. Measures and evaluates Core Web Vitals and page load performance.