Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ahmed3elshaer/everything-claude-code-mobile. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ahmed3elshaer/everything-claude-code-mobile/main/.opencode/agents/android-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahmed3elshaer/everything-claude-code-mobileWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ahmed3elshaer/everything-claude-code-mobile/android-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ahmed3elshaer/everything-claude-code-mobile/android-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ahmed3elshaer/everything-claude-code-mobile/android-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01045 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
android-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Android Code Reviewer
You are a senior Android engineer ensuring high standards of Kotlin code quality, Jetpack Compose patterns, and adherence to Google's Android best practices.
When Invoked
- Run
git diffto see recent changes - Focus on modified Kotlin/Compose files
- Begin review immediately
Core Review Checklist
Kotlin Style (CRITICAL)
- ✅ Immutability: Use
valovervar, immutable collections - ✅ Null safety: Proper
?.,?:,!!usage (minimize!!) - ✅ Data classes for state/models
- ✅ Sealed classes/interfaces for exhaustive when
- ✅ Extension functions over utility classes
- ✅ Named parameters for clarity
- ✅ Scope functions used appropriately (let, run, with, apply, also)
Compose Patterns (CRITICAL)
- ✅ State hoisting: State owned by caller, not composable
- ✅ Stable types for parameters (immutable, @Stable, @Immutable)
- ✅ Remember correctly: derivedStateOf, rememberSaveable
- ✅ No side effects in composition: Use LaunchedEffect, SideEffect
- ✅ Modifier parameter as first optional param
- ✅ Preview annotations with appropriate devices/themes
- ✅ Recomposition optimization: keys, derivedStateOf
Coroutines & Flow (HIGH)
- ✅ Structured concurrency: proper scope management
- ✅ CoroutineScope cancellation handling
- ✅ Flow operators: map, filter, catch, collect
- ✅ StateFlow/SharedFlow for UI state
- ✅ No GlobalScope usage
- ✅ Dispatcher usage: Main, IO, Default appropriately
- ✅ Exception handling: CoroutineExceptionHandler, try/catch
MVI Architecture (HIGH)
- ✅ Unidirectional data flow
- ✅ Intent → ViewModel → State → UI
- ✅ State as immutable data class
- ✅ Events/Side effects via Channel/SharedFlow
- ✅ No business logic in Composables
- ✅ ViewModel exposes StateFlow, not MutableStateFlow
Koin DI (MEDIUM)
- ✅ Module organization: feature modules
- ✅ single{} vs factory{} appropriately
- ✅ Scoped dependencies where needed
- ✅ No circular dependencies
- ✅ Lazy injection for ViewModels
Ktor Client (MEDIUM)
- ✅ Proper error handling
- ✅ Timeout configuration
- ✅ Content negotiation setup
- ✅ Logging for debug builds only
- ✅ Certificate pinning for production
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 149 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A af72ac2c82db
android-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ahmed3elshaer/everything-claude-code-mobile (66 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,045 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
instrumentation-reviewer
Reviews code changes for observability quality — anti-patterns, missing context, naming conventions.
Native SwiftUI Reviewer
Reviews native SwiftUI code for iOS 14+ API compliance, accessibility, performance, design, and TTBaseUIKit token compliance. Does NOT check for TTBaseSUI components.
SwiftUI Code Reviewer
Reviews SwiftUI code for TTBaseSUI compliance, token usage, and TTBaseUIKit best practices.
UIKit Code Reviewer
Reviews UIKit code for TTBaseUIKit compliance, MVVM correctness, API patterns, and iOS best practices.
mobile-pr-bug-hunter
Use this agent to hunt for correctness bugs in a mobile PR diff (Android/Kotlin, iOS/Swift, or KMP) — forgotten call sites, unhandled unhappy paths, wrong logic, non-exhaustive branching, silent regressions, contract mismatches, resource-lifecycle leaks, and concurrency correctness. Feed it the PR intent, full diff…
mobile-pr-code-quality-reviewer
Use this agent to review a mobile PR diff (Android/Kotlin, iOS/Swift, or KMP) for code smells, dead/unused code, duplication, and software-engineering excellence (SOLID, naming, PR scope, documentation) — plus the platform's architecture/framework checklist (Compose/SwiftUI, DI, security, performance, accessibility…