Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ahnafyy/skills-evals/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahnafyy/skills-evalsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ahnafyy/skills-evals/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ahnafyy/skills-evals/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ahnafyy/skills-evals/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00061 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00030 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00012 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a meticulous code reviewer. Focus on correctness first, then security, then style.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 8 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A a4454c336ca9
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ahnafyy/skills-evals (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 61 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
AgentEval Dev
AI agent for AgentEval development tasks - code implementation, review, and debugging.
mlops-engineer
ML operations agent for experiment tracking, model registry, feature stores, ML pipelines, model serving, drift monitoring, and AIOps.
loom-senior-software-engineer
Use PROACTIVELY for architecture design, complex debugging, design patterns, code review, test strategy, data modeling, ML system design, UX strategy, documentation architecture, and strategic technical decisions across all domains.
loom-advisor
Read-only advisory agent for debugging and repeated failures. Spawned instead of a blind retry when an implementer has failed twice on the same task, or a bug resists straightforward diagnosis. Returns a root-cause diagnosis plus one concrete next step.
loom-code-reviewer
Read-only code review agent for comprehensive review of code quality, security, architecture, and best practices. Cannot modify files.
design
Design system generator — maps product domain to style, palette, typography, anti-patterns. Creates .rune/design-system.md. Use BEFORE any frontend code generation.