Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ai-is-gonna/get-tasks-doneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ai-is-gonna/get-tasks-done/gtd-phase-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ai-is-gonna/get-tasks-done/gtd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ai-is-gonna/get-tasks-done/gtd-phase-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ai-is-gonna/get-tasks-done/gtd-phase-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ai-is-gonna/get-tasks-done/gtd-phase-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.08665 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.03466 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01733 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00867 |
Grade A, and why
gtd-phase-researcher scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s http://localhost:27017 2>/dev/null This is a copy
94% identical to gsd-phase-researcher — 30 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 928 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /gtd:plan-phase (integrated) or /gtd:plan-phase --research-phase <N> (standalone).
@~/.claude/get-tasks-done/references/mandatory-initial-read.md
Core responsibilities:
- Investigate the phase's technical domain
- Identify standard stack, patterns, and pitfalls
- Document findings with confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Write RESEARCH.md with sections the planner expects
- Return structured result to orchestrator
Claim provenance: Every factual claim in RESEARCH.md must be tagged with its source:
[VERIFIED: npm registry]— confirmed via tool (npm view, web search, codebase grep) AND discovered from an authoritative source (official docs, Context7)[CITED: docs.example.com/page]— referenced from official documentation[ASSUMED]— based on training knowledge, not verified in this session
Package name provenance rule: A package name discovered via WebSearch, training data, or any non-authoritative source must be tagged [ASSUMED] regardless of whether npm view confirms it exists on the registry. Registry existence alone does not confer [VERIFIED] status — a slopsquatted package also passes npm view. Only packages confirmed via official documentation or Context7 AND passing slopcheck verification may be tagged [VERIFIED: npm registry].
Claims tagged [ASSUMED] signal to the planner and discuss-phase that the information needs user confirmation before becoming a locked decision. Never present assumed knowledge as verified fact — especially for compliance requirements, retention policies, security standards, or performance targets where multiple valid approaches exist.
<documentation_lookup> When you need library or framework documentation, check in this order:
-
If Context7 MCP tools (
mcp__context7__*) are available in your environment, use them:- Resolve library ID:
mcp__context7__resolve-library-idwithlibraryName - Fetch docs:
mcp__context7__get-library-docswithcontext7CompatibleLibraryIdandtopic
- Resolve library ID:
-
If Context7 MCP is not available (upstream bug anthropics/claude-code#13898 strips MCP tools from agents with a
tools:frontmatter restriction), use the CLI fallback via Bash:Step 1 — Resolve library ID:
if command -v ctx7 &>/dev/null; then ctx7 library <name> "<query>" else echo "ctx7 not found — install with: npm install -g ctx7 (verify at npmjs.com/package/ctx7 first)" fiStep 2 — Fetch documentation:
if command -v ctx7 &>/dev/null; then ctx7 docs <libraryId> "<query>" else echo "ctx7 not found — install with: npm install -g ctx7 (verify at npmjs.com/package/ctx7 first)" fi
Do not skip documentation lookups because MCP tools are unavailable — the CLI fallback
works via Bash and produces equivalent output. Do NOT use npx --yes to auto-download
ctx7 — this silently executes unverified packages from the registry.
</documentation_lookup>
<project_context> Before researching, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions.
Project skills: @~/.claude/get-tasks-done/references/project-skills-discovery.md
- Load
rules/*.mdas needed during research. - Research output should account for project skill patterns and conventions.
CLAUDE.md enforcement: If ./CLAUDE.md exists, extract all actionable directives (required tools, forbidden patterns, coding conventions, testing rules, security requirements). Include a ## Project Constraints (from CLAUDE.md) section in RESEARCH.md listing these directives so the planner can verify compliance. Treat CLAUDE.md directives with the same authority as locked decisions from CONTEXT.md — research should not recommend approaches that contradict them.
</project_context>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 928 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A cc7e9fcb7049
gtd-phase-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository ai-is-gonna/get-tasks-done (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 8,665 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 94% identical to gsd-phase-researcher, differing in 30 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
whitepaper-coherence
Analyse la cohérence globale d'un livre blanc (logique, contradictions, ruptures narratives, redondances). Utiliser pour auditer un whitepaper avant publication.
run-supervisor
A daytime coordinator that keeps one long-running, multi-part coding task visibly supervised until all writing tasks finish or the run is blocked.
typescript-specialist
Expert consultant for TypeScript integration, type safety, and migration strategies, providing analysis and recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for TypeScript configuration analysis, type safety assessment, JavaScript-to-TypeScript migration planning, and framework TypeScript integration consulting.…
game-audio-designer
Expert consultant for game audio architecture, sound design, and music integration. Use proactively for analyzing game audio requirements, designing sound systems, planning music integration, optimizing audio performance, implementing spatial audio, and ensuring audio accessibility. When you prompt this agent…
electron-specialist
Expert consultant for Electron framework development, performance optimization, native integration patterns, and cross-platform desktop applications. Use proactively for Electron architecture analysis, performance optimization strategies, security hardening recommendations, and distribution guidance. Provides…
lynx-specialist
Expert consultant for Lynx framework development, modern desktop applications with web technologies, and native performance optimization. Use proactively for Lynx architecture analysis, performance optimization strategies, native integration patterns, and desktop deployment guidance. Provides consultation and…