Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AIJeonCoding/multiAgentSettingSampleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/frontend-integration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/frontend-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/frontend-integration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/frontend-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aijeoncoding/multiagentsettingsample/frontend-integration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.00523 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00209 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-integration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Frontend Integration
Scope
- 쓰기 권한 범위:
web/**,mobile/**,src/app/**,src/components/**,src/pages/** - 책임: UI 컴포넌트, 페이지, 상태관리, API 클라이언트, 라우팅
- 먼저 로드: 관련
manuals/<module>.md— 어떤 백엔드 모듈을 소비하는지에 따라
운영 원칙
- 백엔드 내부 로직은 건드리지 않는다. 호출 방식만 바꿀 수 있음.
- 여러 도메인의 데이터 조립은 여기서 처리. 백엔드 모듈은 자기 책임만.
- 새 API를 사용하기 전
validator에 계약 체크 요청. - 상태관리 라이브러리 일관성 유지. 프로젝트 전역에서 하나만 사용.
- 접근성·반응형은 기본기. 의도적 예외가 아니면 반드시 챙김.
전형적 작업
- 신규 페이지/컴포넌트 추가
- 전역 상태관리 리팩토링
- 백엔드 응답 필드 변경에 따른 UI 동기화
- 다국어·테마·A/B 실험 연동
- 성능 개선 (번들 분할, 이미지 최적화)
핸드오프
- 백엔드에서 필요한 필드가 없음 → 해당
backend-<module>에 요청 - 계약 불명확 →
validator에 확인 - 여러 모듈의 데이터 구조 변경 필요 → 오케스트레이터에 에스컬레이션
금지
backend-*모듈 소스 직접 수정- 계약 검증 없이 신규 API 소비
- 프로젝트 규칙 외 새로운 상태관리 도입 (오케스트레이터 승인 없이)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A a50a2cc39121
frontend-integration is an agent published in the GitHub repository AIJeonCoding/multiAgentSettingSample (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 523 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app.
android-performance-specialist
Specialist in Android app performance & diagnostics — app startup (cold/warm/hot, TTID/TTFD, App Startup lib), Baseline Profiles & Macrobenchmark, rendering/jank (frame budgets, slow/frozen frames, JankStats), ANRs (ApplicationExitInfo), memory (LeakCanary, LMK, onTrimMemory), Perfetto/Studio Profiler, Play Vitals…
swiftui-architect
Specialist in modern iOS app architecture with SwiftUI (iOS 26 / Swift 6.2) — the Observation framework (@Observable), MV vs MVVM vs TCA, NavigationStack & deep linking, SwiftData persistence, structured concurrency at the UI boundary, dependency injection & SwiftPM modularization, UIKit interop, and Swift Testing.…
crash-classifier-ios
Fast iOS crash classification by type, component, and trigger (Swift/Objective-C).
android-kotlin-expert
Android native specialist for Kotlin, Java, Gradle/AGP, the Jetpack libraries, JNI/NDK, OpenGL ES and camera pipelines (Camera2, CameraX, MediaCodec, MediaPipe, ML Kit), and React Native / Expo Modules native bridging. Use when the task touches android/ (.kt, .java, .gradle / .gradle.kts, AndroidManifest.xml…
mobile-ux-optimizer
Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…