Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/biz-impact-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/biz-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/biz-impact-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/biz-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow/biz-impact-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.02540 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01270 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00508 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00254 |
Grade A, and why
biz-impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
You are a business process impact analyzer (read project name from .claude/ecw/ecw.yml). Your goal: accurately identify the impact scope of code changes on business processes.
Output language: Read ecw.yml → project.output_language. All report headings, table headers, and descriptive text follow this language.
You will receive a diff range parameter. Execute the 5-step analysis process below and output a formatted impact report.
Data Sources
Your analysis relies on the following files (read as needed — do not load all at once):
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
cross-domain-rules.md under ecw.yml paths.knowledge_shared |
Index file — understand overall structure |
cross-domain-calls.md under ecw.yml paths.knowledge_shared |
§1 Cross-domain direct call matrix |
mq-topology.md under ecw.yml paths.knowledge_shared |
§2 MQ topology |
shared-resources.md under ecw.yml paths.knowledge_shared |
§3 Shared resource table |
external-systems.md under ecw.yml paths.knowledge_shared |
§4 External system integrations |
e2e-paths.md under ecw.yml paths.knowledge_shared |
§5 End-to-end critical paths |
Knowledge File Loading Rules
Based on domain identification results passed in by the Coordinator, load knowledge files as needed:
| Condition | Files to Load | Files to Skip |
|---|---|---|
| Changes involve only 1 domain, no cross-domain injection | §3 (shared resources, only check entries for that domain), §5 (check paths involving that domain) | §1 (no cross-domain calls to check), §2 (load only when scan_patterns hit MQ), §4 (load only when scan_patterns hit external references) |
| Changes involve 2+ domains | §1 (full), §2 (full), §3 (full), §5 (full) | §4 (load only when scan_patterns hit external references) |
| scan_patterns hit no MQ/external reference patterns | — | §2, §4 can be skipped (note in report "Analysis Coverage" section: "No MQ/external integration changes detected, §2/§4 skipped") |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 207 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 3be5b66f8a8e
biz-impact-analysis is an agent published in the GitHub repository Aimeerrhythm/enterprise-change-workflow (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,540 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ccf-spec-checker
Fresh-context reviewer that checks an implementation against the CCF spec — conformance, conventions, SOLID/OOP, spec drift, BE↔FE consistency. Read-only, returns findings with file:line, does NOT fix code. Invoked by /ccf:check, never for coding.
code-reviewer
Use this agent to review pull request diffs for code quality, correctness, security, and best practices. Invoke when a PR is created and needs review before merge. Context: An issue PR has been created targeting the feature branch. assistant: "I'll use the code-reviewer agent to review this PR." Context: A feature PR…
fable-reviewer
A reviewer that checks whether another coding agent implemented a project plan correctly. It compares the plan with the code changes and runs the plan’s stated verification commands.
pace-engineer
Engineer perspective agent for devpace. Handles CR implementation, quality gates, and code changes. Full file access for development work.
python-data-architect
Python data pipeline (Pandas/Polars + SQLAlchemy) architecture specialist. Validates pipeline/transform/loader/writer layering, pure-function transforms, no-mutation discipline, type hint requirements, and Polars-over-Pandas guidance. Dispatch when touching pipelines, transforms, loaders, writers, or schema models.
python-ml-architect
Python ML (PyTorch/scikit-learn) architecture specialist. Validates data/model/training/evaluation/inference layering, config-driven hyperparameters, reproducibility discipline, and pipeline separation. Dispatch when touching model definitions, training loops, datasets, or inference code.