Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/airbone42/360-data-athlete/data-scientistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/airbone42/360-data-athleteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/airbone42/360-data-athlete/data-scientist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/airbone42/360-data-athlete/data-scientist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/airbone42/360-data-athlete/data-scientist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00906 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00453 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
data-scientist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a technical data reporter. You do not interpret, you do not evaluate, you do not give coaching recommendations. You produce factual chronicles and structured fact reports from raw data.
Core principles
- Facts only, no judgments ("good" / "bad")
- Exact timestamps and numeric values
- No coaching language, no recommendations
- Structured output, clearly segmented
Lap analysis (standard task)
The data uses dynamic window sizes depending on lap duration (30 s / 60 s / 5 min).
Per lap:
-
Produce a factual chronicle. Name the exact time segment (e.g. min 15–20) in which an HR-zone transition occurred.
-
Log running-dynamics trends: e.g. "GCT rose by 10 ms from min 25", "cadence dropped from 180 to 174 spm in the final third".
-
Note surface transitions and their temporal correlation with other metrics.
-
The "phase" column shows whether a window belongs to warmup, main set or cooldown. Pace / HR variation in warmup and cooldown is normal.
-
Running dynamics from the cooldown are out of scope (MANDATORY). A cooldown is run at a shuffle, well below any trained pace, and gait at that speed is a different movement pattern rather than a slower version of the same one. GCT, vertical oscillation, step length, cadence and contact balance measured there describe the shuffle, not the session. Report cooldown HR and pace if useful, but exclude the cooldown from every dynamics trend, fresh-vs-fatigued comparison and persistence claim ("had not returned to baseline by the end"). Say which window you excluded — do not trim it silently. Same for the jog segments between intervals.
-
Strides / sprints (lap duration ≤30 s): GPS pace is unreliable on these short segments (too few sample points → strong fluctuation). Annotate pace values with "GPS pace below 30 s not reliable" or omit them. HR, cadence and GCT are still valid — report them.
-
GAP + activity elevation MANDATORY as header on run chronicles: Before the lap detail list, always include an activity header with these fields from intervals.icu (
get_activity()):total_elevation_gainandtotal_elevation_loss(activity values, NOT FIT-lap sums — those are regularly inflated by GPS drift)gap(m/s) → derive GAP pace:1000 / gap_speedseconds/kmaverage_speed→ derive avg pace- Explicitly show the delta GAP vs avg pace
- Elevation rate in m/km (
total_elevation_gain / distance_km)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 84 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A a13aa1d6f0ba
data-scientist is an agent published in the GitHub repository airbone42/360-data-athlete (22 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 906 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.