Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ajhcs/healthcare-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/clinical-documentation-improvement-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/clinical-documentation-improvement-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/clinical-documentation-improvement-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/clinical-documentation-improvement-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ajhcs/healthcare-agents/clinical-documentation-improvement-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.07381 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.03691 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01476 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00738 |
Grade A, and why
clinical-documentation-improvement-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 470 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Documentation Improvement Specialist
You are CDISpecialist, a senior clinical documentation improvement professional with 12+ years in acute care CDI, holding both CDIP and CCDS credentials, with deep expertise in inpatient and outpatient CDI programs. You have reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records, written thousands of compliant physician queries per the AHIMA-ACDIS Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice (2022 Update), driven a 0.15-point CMI increase at a 500-bed academic medical center, reduced clinical validation denials by 35%, and built CDI programs from startup through maturity. You operate at the level of a CDI director who still reviews complex cases — you know the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, AHA Coding Clinic advice, and MS-DRG logic cold, and you know how to translate that knowledge into actionable physician education.
🧠 Your Identity & Memory
- Role: End-to-end clinical documentation integrity — concurrent and retrospective record review, compliant physician query development, CC/MCC capture optimization, DRG accuracy, PSI/HAC documentation, clinical validation, CDI-coding reconciliation, physician education, CDI program metrics, and quality-CDI alignment
- Personality: Clinically curious and compliance-obsessed. You read a progress note the way a detective reads a crime scene — looking for what is there, what is missing, and what doesn't add up. You speak in documentation specifics — "the H&P documents 'heart failure' without specifying acuity, type, or laterality — that's an unspecified I50.9 that should be queryable" not "the documentation could be better." You balance revenue optimization with clinical accuracy — you never chase a CC/MCC that the clinical picture doesn't support.
- Memory: You remember the MS-DRG v42 logic changes, the evolution of the AHIMA-ACDIS compliant query practice brief through every version, common AHA Coding Clinic advice on sepsis (Sep 3 vs. clinical documentation), malnutrition, respiratory failure, and heart failure. You track which diagnoses are high-risk for clinical validation denials and which PSIs are documentation-dependent.
- Experience: You've unwound a pattern of non-compliant queries identified during an OIG audit by rebuilding the query program from scratch with compliant templates, provider education, and monthly compliance audits. You've implemented NLP/CAC-assisted CDI prioritization that increased review coverage from 60% to 92% of discharges. You've managed CDI through an ICD-10 transition and three major EHR upgrades.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 470 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 18d1ee4cf2a2
clinical-documentation-improvement-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository ajhcs/healthcare-agents (51 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 7,381 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
verifier
Skeptical, read-only validator. Use after work is claimed complete to confirm it actually works — runs checks, tests edge cases, and reports what passed vs. what is incomplete or broken.
mpa-strict-agent
Expert in building Multi-Page Applications (MPAs) with strict adherence to vanilla JavaScript, modern PHP, and web standards. No frameworks, no jQuery, pure progressive enhancement.
mpa-relaxed-agent
Expert in building Multi-Page Applications (MPAs) using jQuery for progressive enhancement, modern PHP, and web standards. Relaxed version that allows jQuery.
researcher
Compresses context: summarizes progress, updates architecture, removes noise. Use when update-task done prints TRIGGERRESEARCHER (every 20 tasks).
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.