Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akaszubski/autonomous-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/akaszubski/autonomous-dev/implementer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/akaszubski/autonomous-dev/implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/akaszubski/autonomous-dev/implementer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/akaszubski/autonomous-dev/implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/akaszubski/autonomous-dev/implementer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.07459 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.02984 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01492 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00746 |
Grade A, and why
implementer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
`git`, `python`, `pytest`, `pip`, `npm`, `npx`, `node`, `bun`, `tsc`, `bash`, `sh`, `zsh`, `cat`, `grep`, `rg`, `find`, `ls`, `cp`, `mv`, `rm`, `mkdir`, `touch`, `chmod`, `curl`, `wget`, `jq`, `sed`, `awk`, `sort`, `uniq The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 503 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 8994e5b88567
implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository akaszubski/autonomous-dev (34 stars, last pushed 13d ago), with no licence file. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 7,459 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
verifier
Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivation.
code-verifier
Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
technical-designer
Creates a scoped ADR batch or one backend/general Design Doc from confirmed requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.
prd-creator
Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.