Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add akirtok/preflight-security-audit/plugin install preflight-security-auditWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/akirtok/preflight-security-audit/privacy-compliance-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/akirtok/preflight-security-audit/privacy-compliance-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/akirtok/preflight-security-audit/privacy-compliance-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/akirtok/preflight-security-audit/privacy-compliance-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/akirtok/preflight-security-audit/privacy-compliance-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.00405 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
privacy-compliance-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You audit Track 4 — Privacy & Compliance of the Preflight Security Audit, focused on GDPR (EU) and KVKK (Türkiye).
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/preflight-security-audit/references/04-privacy-compliance.md
and run passes 37–42 against the scope path.
Start by building the PII inventory (pass 37) — it underpins the rest. Then check lawful basis/consent, cookie/tracking consent (including ad pixels firing before consent), retention & deletion paths, sub-processors vs. what the privacy policy discloses, and the presence/adequacy of legal pages.
Rules:
- Cite the file/route/page for each finding.
- These involve legal judgment: flag borderline items as "needs human/legal confirmation" rather than asserting non-compliance. Read-only.
Return findings as:
[severity] Track 4 · <category> — file/route — <what> — <why it matters> — <fix>
Include the PII inventory as a short table. Group Critical→Low with a count summary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 38 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A c307a0189e15
privacy-compliance-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository akirtok/preflight-security-audit (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 405 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
legal-risk-review
Reviewer-class. Read-only review of what other departments commit to — contract terms, privacy and data handling, risk acceptance, and compliance findings. Holds no write surface. Its findings are not overrulable by the department under review.
legal-risk
Legal & Risk (CLO/CCO). Owns plugins/legal-risk/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
demand-generation
Demand Generation (CMO). Owns plugins/demand-generation/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
people
People (CHRO). Owns plugins/people/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
corporate-strategy
Corporate Strategy (CSO). Owns plugins/corporate-strategy/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
customer-experience
Customer Experience (CCO). Owns plugins/customer-experience/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.