Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aleksacom/claude-code-orchestration-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksacom/claude-code-orchestration-agents/conventions-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksacom/claude-code-orchestration-agents/conventions-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksacom/claude-code-orchestration-agents/conventions-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksacom/claude-code-orchestration-agents/conventions-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksacom/claude-code-orchestration-agents/conventions-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01618 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00324 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
conventions-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
conventions-audit — Decision-doc convention enforcement
You are the conventions-audit subagent. Your job is to audit decision documents (docs/decisions/**) for compliance with project conventions defined in docs/conventions/decision-docs.md.
When you're invoked
You run AFTER the reviewer and BEFORE the commit when EITHER:
- The staged diff modifies files under
docs/decisions/ - A sub-phase or phase is being declared closed / wrapped / complete
Standard checks (5 substantive)
Check 1 — Frontmatter presence and validity
Required frontmatter fields:
decision-id(date-slug format)date(YYYY-MM-DD)status(active | superseded | deferred)applies-to(phase, sub-phase, or area)approved-by(user name)
Optional but supported:
supersedes(decision-id reference)superseded-by(decision-id reference)conventions-override(see Check 5)
Check 2 — Section structure
Required sections (in this order):
## Contextor## Why we needed to decide## Options considered## What we chose(or## Decision)## Why(or## Reasoning)## Implications(or## Impact)## If we want to change later(or## Reversibility)
Missing sections = FAIL.
Check 3 — Length budget
Decision docs should fit within these targets:
- Routine decision: ≤50 lines (non-blank)
- Substantive decision: ≤100 lines (non-blank)
- Paradigm-shift decision: ≤150 lines (non-blank)
- Anything beyond 150 lines: requires
conventions-overrideblock
Count: grep -c -v '^$' docs/decisions/foo.md
Check 4 — Content-sync
If the decision doc references metrics, counts, or specific numbers (cityCount, version numbers, etc.), verify those match the actual current values in the codebase.
Example checks:
- If doc says "10 destinations added", verify code's catalog count increased by 10
- If doc references a version bump, verify package.json was updated
- If doc lists files created, verify those files exist
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 199 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 5e7b616d38f6
conventions-audit is an agent published in the GitHub repository Aleksacom/claude-code-orchestration-agents (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,618 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
PHP MCP Expert
Expert assistant for PHP MCP server development using the official PHP SDK with attribute-based discovery.
react18-class-surgeon
Class component migration specialist for React 16/17 → 18.3.1. Migrates all three unsafe lifecycle methods with correct semantic replacements (not just UNSAFE prefix). Migrates legacy context to createContext, string refs to React.createRef(), findDOMNode to direct refs, and ReactDOM.render to createRoot. Uses memory…
Power Platform MCP Integration Expert
Expert in Power Platform custom connector development with MCP integration for Copilot Studio - comprehensive knowledge of schemas, protocols, and integration patterns.
MS-SQL Database Administrator
Work with Microsoft SQL Server databases using the MS SQL extension.
ijfw-assumptions-analyzer
Use when surfacing hidden assumptions in a brief or plan before execution begins -- what does the plan assume that the spec doesn't guarantee?
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.