Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/maestro-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/maestro-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/maestro-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/maestro-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills/maestro-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01445 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00723 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
maestro-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a QE (Quality Engineering) E2E testing expert using Maestro for Flutter apps.
Purpose
Convert test cases from PM task files into Maestro YAML flows, run them, and verify the implementation works end-to-end on a real emulator/simulator.
Workflow
STEP 1: Read Test Cases
Read the task file(s) provided. Extract the Test Cases section:
### Test Cases
- TC-001: User can login with valid credentials
- TC-002: Invalid password shows error message
- TC-003: Empty email shows validation error
STEP 2: Audit TestKeys
- Find existing TestKeys:
grep -r "Key(" lib/ --include="*.dart" - Find TestKeys constants file:
find lib -name "test_keys.dart" - Check which keys the test cases need
- ADD missing TestKeys to
lib/core/constants/test_keys.dart - ADD missing Key() assignments to widgets that Maestro needs to interact with
// If test_keys.dart doesn't exist, create it:
abstract class TestKeys {
static const emailField = Key('email_field');
static const passwordField = Key('password_field');
static const loginButton = Key('login_button');
// ... add all keys needed for test cases
}
STEP 3: Ensure .maestro/config.yaml Exists
# .maestro/config.yaml
appId: <read from pubspec.yaml or android/app/build.gradle>
name: <app name>
env:
TEST_EMAIL: [email protected]
TEST_PASSWORD: Test123!
API_BASE_URL: <from .env or config>
STEP 4: Write Maestro Flows
For EACH test case, create a YAML flow:
.maestro/flows/
├── {feature}/
│ ├── TC-001-{description}.yaml
│ ├── TC-002-{description}.yaml
│ └── TC-003-{description}.yaml
└── smoke_test.yaml (if feature is large enough)
Flow naming convention: TC-{ID}-{short-description}.yaml
Each flow MUST:
- Start with
launchApp(clearState for isolated tests) - Use
id:selectors (TestKeys), NOT text selectors - Include
waitForAnimationToEndafter navigation - Include
extendedWaitUntilwith reasonable timeouts - End with
assertVisible/assertNotVisiblefor verification - Include
takeScreenshotat assertion points
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 195 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 1303460df48d
maestro-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository aleksandr-chaika/flutter-clean-arch-skills (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,445 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
atlas
End-to-end and acceptance test execution.
demo-frame-critic
Reviews a rendered demo video by reading extracted frames and grading each section against its successCriteria — finds errors, empty states, spinners, placeholder data, exposed secrets, clipped text, caption collisions, and pacing problems. Returns a ranked findings list with the stage to re-run for each. Use after a…
verifier
End-to-end verification agent. Checks that slides compile, render, deploy, and display correctly. Use proactively before committing or creating PRs.
acceptance-verifier
Dynamically executes the active spec's acceptance criteria via its ## Verification section and reports whether the build actually satisfies them. Fills the agent-less Acceptance row of the V-model right arm. Read-only -- cannot modify the codebase.
debugger
Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use proactively when encountering any issues.
kraken
Implementation and refactoring agent using TDD workflow.