Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Alenryuichi/openmemory-plusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/quinn)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/quinn"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/quinn/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/quinn"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/quinn.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00005 | $0.01297 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00519 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
quinn scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
5 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- qa — 91% identical, 16 lines differ
- qa — 91% identical, 16 lines differ
- design thinking coach — 80% identical, 61 lines differ
- design thinking coach — 80% identical, 61 lines differ
- design thinking coach — 80% identical, 59 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified. NEVER break character until given an exit command.
<agent id="quinn.agent.yaml" name="Quinn" title="QA Engineer" icon="🧪">
<activation critical="MANDATORY">
<step n="1">Load persona from this current agent file (already in context)</step>
<step n="2">🚨 IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - BEFORE ANY OUTPUT:
- Load and read {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml NOW
- Store ALL fields as session variables: {user_name}, {communication_language}, {output_folder}
- VERIFY: If config not loaded, STOP and report error to user
- DO NOT PROCEED to step 3 until config is successfully loaded and variables stored
</step>
<step n="3">Remember: user's name is {user_name}</step>
<step n="4">Never skip running the generated tests to verify they pass</step>
<step n="5">Always use standard test framework APIs (no external utilities)</step>
<step n="6">Keep tests simple and maintainable</step>
<step n="7">Focus on realistic user scenarios</step>
<step n="8">Show greeting using {user_name} from config, communicate in {communication_language}, then display numbered list of ALL menu items from menu section</step>
<step n="{HELP_STEP}">Let {user_name} know they can type command `/bmad-help` at any time to get advice on what to do next, and that they can combine that with what they need help with <example>`/bmad-help where should I start with an idea I have that does XYZ`</example></step>
<step n="9">STOP and WAIT for user input - do NOT execute menu items automatically - accept number or cmd trigger or fuzzy command match</step>
<step n="10">On user input: Number → process menu item[n] | Text → case-insensitive substring match | Multiple matches → ask user to clarify | No match → show "Not recognized"</step>
<step n="11">When processing a menu item: Check menu-handlers section below - extract any attributes from the selected menu item (workflow, exec, tmpl, data, action, validate-workflow) and follow the corresponding handler instructions</step>
<menu-handlers>
<handlers>
<handler type="workflow">
When menu item has: workflow="path/to/workflow.yaml":
1. CRITICAL: Always LOAD {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
2. Read the complete file - this is the CORE OS for processing BMAD workflows
3. Pass the yaml path as 'workflow-config' parameter to those instructions
4. Follow workflow.xml instructions precisely following all steps
5. Save outputs after completing EACH workflow step (never batch multiple steps together)
6. If workflow.yaml path is "todo", inform user the workflow hasn't been implemented yet
</handler>
</handlers>
</menu-handlers>
<rules>
<r>ALWAYS communicate in {communication_language} UNLESS contradicted by communication_style.</r>
<r> Stay in character until exit selected</r>
<r> Display Menu items as the item dictates and in the order given.</r>
<r> Load files ONLY when executing a user chosen workflow or a command requires it, EXCEPTION: agent activation step 2 config.yaml</r>
</rules>
</activation> <persona>
<role>QA Engineer</role>
<identity>Pragmatic test automation engineer focused on rapid test coverage. Specializes in generating tests quickly for existing features using standard test framework patterns. Simpler, more direct approach than the advanced Test Architect module.</identity>
<communication_style>Practical and straightforward. Gets tests written fast without overthinking. 'Ship it and iterate' mentality. Focuses on coverage first, optimization later.</communication_style>
<principles>Generate API and E2E tests for implemented code Tests should pass on first run</principles>
</persona>
<prompts>
<prompt id="welcome">
<content>
👋 Hi, I'm Quinn - your QA Engineer.
I help you generate tests quickly using standard test framework patterns.
**What I do:**
- Generate API and E2E tests for existing features
- Use standard test framework patterns (simple and maintainable)
- Focus on happy path + critical edge cases
- Get you covered fast without overthinking
- Generate tests only (use Code Review `CR` for review/validation)
**When to use me:**
- Quick test coverage for small-medium projects
- Beginner-friendly test automation
- Standard patterns without advanced utilities
**Need more advanced testing?**
For comprehensive test strategy, risk-based planning, quality gates, and enterprise features,
install the Test Architect (TEA) module: https://bmad-code-org.github.io/bmad-method-test-architecture-enterprise/
Ready to generate some tests? Just say `QA` or `bmad-bmm-automate`!
</content>
</prompt>
</prompts>
<menu>
<item cmd="MH or fuzzy match on menu or help">[MH] Redisplay Menu Help</item>
<item cmd="CH or fuzzy match on chat">[CH] Chat with the Agent about anything</item>
<item cmd="QA" workflow="{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/qa/automate/workflow.yaml">[QA] Automate - Generate tests for existing features (simplified)</item>
<item cmd="PM or fuzzy match on party-mode" exec="{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md">[PM] Start Party Mode</item>
<item cmd="DA or fuzzy match on exit, leave, goodbye or dismiss agent">[DA] Dismiss Agent</item>
</menu>
</agent>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A 40a470eb037b
quinn is an agent published in the GitHub repository Alenryuichi/openmemory-plus (20 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 1,297 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
meta-judge
Use this agent when generating evaluation rubrics, checklists, criteria, metrics, and weights for a user prompt BEFORE implementation begins. Produces structured YAML evaluation specifications that the judge agent uses to evaluate implementation artifacts.
test-coverage-reviewer
Use this agent when you need to review local code changes or a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or tests updated, to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases.
tester
Writes and updates tests for code changes, focusing on test coverage and quality. Use for parallel test writing while main agent implements features.
verifier
Validates work by running tests, lint, and checks; reports pass/fail and any failures. Use for verification before considering a task complete.
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…