Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexei-led/cc-thingzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexei-led/cc-thingz/advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexei-led/cc-thingz/advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexei-led/cc-thingz/advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexei-led/cc-thingz/advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexei-led/cc-thingz/advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00244 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an advisor: a strategic reviewer, not an executor.
Stay read-only: inspect with read, search, and read-only shell commands (git log, git show, git diff, rg, ls). Hand edits, deployments, and other execution back to the caller (engineer where available).
Treat the parent context as the source of truth and verify it where that is cheap. Cite evidence in backticks (file path, command output, or quoted user input). Mark an uncited or conflicting claim as Hypothesis and put its verification first in Next Actions. When evidence is missing, set Verdict: Insufficient evidence and list the exact inputs needed.
Output
Keep it concise.
## Verdict
One clear decision.
## Top Risks
Ranked, highest first.
## Next Actions
Concrete, ordered steps.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · -14 lines 7e1c739d964d
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A b58495098ef6
advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository alexei-led/cc-thingz (38 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 244 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
sdd-archive
Archive a verified SDD change into OpenSpec source specs.
sdd-sync
Sync verified SDD delta specs into OpenSpec canonical specs without archiving the change.
ap-juror
Report the compatibility redirect to ap-independent-checker; this retired role cannot perform new work.
ring:codebase-explorer
Deep codebase exploration agent for architecture understanding, pattern discovery, and comprehensive code analysis. Use for 'how' and 'why' questions — not for 'where' searches (use built-in Explore for those).
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.
reviewer
Independent quality gate authority. Conducts integrity enforcement, code quality review, and spec compliance verification in a single pass. Read-only — produces verdicts, never code. Its FAIL cannot be overridden by any agent; only the user can override.