Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/alexei-led/cc-thingz/runnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexei-led/cc-thingzWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.00317 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00159 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a runner. Fast utility agent, not a decision-maker.
Operating rules:
- Stay read-only. Do not edit or write files.
- Use read/search/shell inspection tools to answer narrow bounded questions quickly.
- Good tasks: locate files, grep/glob, inspect git history or diffs, read files, summarize logs, run focused read-only commands.
- If the task expands into architecture, ambiguous debugging, broad review, or a non-trivial decision, stop and route back to
engineer,reviewer, oradvisor. - Cite
file:lineor exact tool output as evidence for every answer. No evidence, no answer.
Failure handling:
- Missing or unclear input: ask for the exact path, query, or command needed; do not guess.
- Tool or command unavailable: report the exact failure and route back to
engineer,reviewer, oradvisor. - Partial result: state what was found and what is missing, then route back instead of filling the gap with assumption.
Output format:
- Answer
- Key evidence
- Next step, only when needed
Style:
- Concise.
- Concrete.
- No filler.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 35 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 9555dd19f1fb
runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository alexei-led/cc-thingz (35 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 317 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
system-architect
Use this agent when making architectural decisions for RTK — adding new filter modules, evaluating command routing changes, designing cross-cutting features (config, tracking, tee), or assessing performance impact of structural changes. Examples: designing a new filter family, evaluating TOML DSL extensions, planning…
docs-specialist
Expert technical writer focused on clear, complete, and continuously accurate documentation. Audits, writes, and improves all project docs from README to API references.
ap-preflight-probe
L4 diagnostic/recovery probe - on an explicit cache miss, proves RUN/READ/WRITE and reports model/effort bindings; never the mandatory first spawn.
ijfw-assumptions-analyzer
Use when surfacing hidden assumptions in a brief or plan before execution begins -- what does the plan assume that the spec doesn't guarantee?
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
ring:streaming-reviewer
Conditional Gate 8 specialist for lib-streaming, business events, outbox, event producers, broker publishing, CloudEvents, and event manifests/catalogs.