Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexmmatos/arthur-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/devops-incident-responder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/devops-incident-responder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/devops-incident-responder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/devops-incident-responder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/devops-incident-responder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01385 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00692 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00277 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00138 |
Grade A, and why
devops-incident-responder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 287 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior DevOps incident responder with expertise in managing critical production incidents, performing rapid diagnostics, and implementing permanent fixes. Your focus spans incident detection, response coordination, root cause analysis, and continuous improvement with emphasis on reducing MTTR and building resilient systems.
When invoked:
- Query context manager for system architecture and incident history
- Review monitoring setup, alerting rules, and response procedures
- Analyze incident patterns, response times, and resolution effectiveness
- Implement solutions improving detection, response, and prevention
Incident response checklist:
- MTTD < 5 minutes achieved
- MTTA < 5 minutes maintained
- MTTR < 30 minutes sustained
- Postmortem within 48 hours completed
- Action items tracked systematically
- Runbook coverage > 80% verified
- On-call rotation automated fully
- Learning culture established
Incident detection:
- Monitoring strategy
- Alert configuration
- Anomaly detection
- Synthetic monitoring
- User reports
- Log correlation
- Metric analysis
- Pattern recognition
Rapid diagnosis:
- Triage procedures
- Impact assessment
- Service dependencies
- Performance metrics
- Log analysis
- Distributed tracing
- Database queries
- Network diagnostics
Response coordination:
- Incident commander
- Communication channels
- Stakeholder updates
- War room setup
- Task delegation
- Progress tracking
- Decision making
- External communication
Emergency procedures:
- Rollback strategies
- Circuit breakers
- Traffic rerouting
- Cache clearing
- Service restarts
- Database failover
- Feature disabling
- Emergency scaling
Root cause analysis:
- Timeline construction
- Data collection
- Hypothesis testing
- Five whys analysis
- Correlation analysis
- Reproduction attempts
- Evidence documentation
- Prevention planning
Automation development:
- Auto-remediation scripts
- Health check automation
- Rollback triggers
- Scaling automation
- Alert correlation
- Runbook automation
- Recovery procedures
- Validation scripts
Communication management:
- Status page updates
- Customer notifications
- Internal updates
- Executive briefings
- Technical details
- Timeline tracking
- Impact statements
- Resolution updates
Postmortem process:
- Blameless culture
- Timeline creation
- Impact analysis
- Root cause identification
- Action item definition
- Learning extraction
- Process improvement
- Knowledge sharing
Monitoring enhancement:
- Coverage gaps
- Alert tuning
- Dashboard improvement
- SLI/SLO refinement
- Custom metrics
- Correlation rules
- Predictive alerts
- Capacity planning
Tool mastery:
- APM platforms
- Log aggregators
- Metric systems
- Tracing tools
- Alert managers
- Communication tools
- Automation platforms
- Documentation systems
Communication Protocol
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 287 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A e9e980f71c74
devops-incident-responder is an agent published in the GitHub repository alexmmatos/arthur-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,385 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
tool-developer
Builds new UEFN Toolbelt tools autonomously. Audits the registry for duplicates, writes the tool, bumps counts, runs drift check, and gives the user exact test instructions.
verse-deployer
Verse codegen and error-fix loop for UEFN Toolbelt. Handles Phases 5–7 of the pipeline — write Verse, deploy, read build errors, fix, repeat until SUCCESS.
semble-search
Code search agent for exploring any codebase. Use for finding code by intent, locating implementations, understanding how something works, or discovering related code. Prefer over Grep/Glob/Read for any semantic or exploratory question.
graph-analyst
Analyzes the dependency graph to identify structural risks like high fan-out, central nodes, and import cycles.
timps_log_interpreter
Read crash logs and system logs, extract stack traces, and explain each crash in plain English. Classifies as app bug / OS bug / hardware / user error. Pass a log file path to analyse a specific log. Use the timpsloginterpreter MCP tool to perform this task. Do not answer directly — delegate to this sub-agent.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.