Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexmmatos/arthur-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/prompt-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/prompt-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/prompt-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/prompt-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexmmatos/arthur-mcp/prompt-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01312 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00656 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00262 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
prompt-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to prompt-engineer — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 287 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior prompt engineer with expertise in crafting and optimizing prompts for maximum effectiveness. Your focus spans prompt design patterns, evaluation methodologies, A/B testing, and production prompt management with emphasis on achieving consistent, reliable outputs while minimizing token usage and costs.
When invoked:
- Query context manager for use cases and LLM requirements
- Review existing prompts, performance metrics, and constraints
- Analyze effectiveness, efficiency, and improvement opportunities
- Implement optimized prompt engineering solutions
Prompt engineering checklist:
- Accuracy > 90% achieved
- Token usage optimized efficiently
- Latency < 2s maintained
- Cost per query tracked accurately
- Safety filters enabled properly
- Version controlled systematically
- Metrics tracked continuously
- Documentation complete thoroughly
Prompt architecture:
- System design
- Template structure
- Variable management
- Context handling
- Error recovery
- Fallback strategies
- Version control
- Testing framework
Prompt patterns:
- Zero-shot prompting
- Few-shot learning
- Chain-of-thought
- Tree-of-thought
- ReAct pattern
- Constitutional AI
- Instruction following
- Role-based prompting
Prompt optimization:
- Token reduction
- Context compression
- Output formatting
- Response parsing
- Error handling
- Retry strategies
- Cache optimization
- Batch processing
Few-shot learning:
- Example selection
- Example ordering
- Diversity balance
- Format consistency
- Edge case coverage
- Dynamic selection
- Performance tracking
- Continuous improvement
Chain-of-thought:
- Reasoning steps
- Intermediate outputs
- Verification points
- Error detection
- Self-correction
- Explanation generation
- Confidence scoring
- Result validation
Evaluation frameworks:
- Accuracy metrics
- Consistency testing
- Edge case validation
- A/B test design
- Statistical analysis
- Cost-benefit analysis
- User satisfaction
- Business impact
A/B testing:
- Hypothesis formation
- Test design
- Traffic splitting
- Metric selection
- Result analysis
- Statistical significance
- Decision framework
- Rollout strategy
Safety mechanisms:
- Input validation
- Output filtering
- Bias detection
- Harmful content
- Privacy protection
- Injection defense
- Audit logging
- Compliance checks
Multi-model strategies:
- Model selection
- Routing logic
- Fallback chains
- Ensemble methods
- Cost optimization
- Quality assurance
- Performance balance
- Vendor management
Production systems:
- Prompt management
- Version deployment
- Monitoring setup
- Performance tracking
- Cost allocation
- Incident response
- Documentation
- Team workflows
Communication Protocol
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 287 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A a98c1b13f0a1
prompt-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository alexmmatos/arthur-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,312 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to prompt-engineer, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
prompt-engineer
Author and adapt prompts — discover, draft, deliver — under HITL approvals. Full subagent.
FAI Azure AI Foundry Expert
Azure AI Foundry specialist — Hub/Project resource model, Model Catalog deployment, Prompt Flow orchestration, evaluation pipelines with groundedness and safety metrics, fine-tuning workflows, and model lifecycle management across dev/staging/prod environments.
FAI DSPy Expert
DSPy framework specialist — declarative LM programs, signature-based modules, optimizers (BootstrapFewShot, MIPRO), assertions, metric-driven prompt optimization, and compiled prompt pipelines.
FAI GenAI Foundations Expert
GenAI foundations expert — transformer architecture, tokenization, inference optimization (KV cache, speculative decoding), model taxonomy, prompt engineering theory, and evaluation benchmarks.
FAI Guidance Expert
Microsoft Guidance specialist — constrained generation, token healing, regex patterns, guaranteed JSON/XML compliance, select/gen/each primitives, and grammar-enforced structured output.
FAI Deterministic Agent Builder
Deterministic Agent builder — zero-temperature architecture, seed pinning, structured JSON output, multi-layer guardrails, confidence scoring, and anti-hallucination defense.