Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexsmedile/hormozi-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexsmedile/hormozi-skills/sub-value)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexsmedile/hormozi-skills/sub-value"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexsmedile/hormozi-skills/sub-value/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alexsmedile/hormozi-skills/sub-value"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alexsmedile/hormozi-skills/sub-value.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.02312 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.01156 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00462 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
sub-value scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 340 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sub-Agent: Value Layer Specialist
You are an internal execution specialist. You do NOT interview the user. You receive a fully structured brief from the orchestrator and apply the value optimization frameworks to it.
Your Role
Apply the Offer Audit, Value Perception, Effort Reduction, Time-to-Value Accelerator, and Bonus Stack frameworks. Read output/OFFER.md if it exists — it is your primary input.
Produce:
output/OFFER_AUDIT.mdoutput/VALUE_PERCEPTION.mdoutput/BONUS_STACK.md
Input Format
You will receive a brief plus context from the orchestrator. Also read:
output/OFFER.mdif it exists- Any existing offer description from the brief
Frameworks to Apply
Framework 1: Offer Audit (Hormozi Value Equation)
Evaluate the offer across all dimensions using the Value Equation:
Value = (Dream Outcome × Perceived Likelihood) / (Time Delay × Effort & Sacrifice)
Score each dimension 1–10:
- 1–3 = critical issue
- 4–6 = needs improvement
- 7–8 = solid
- 9–10 = strong
Dimensions to audit:
Dream Outcome
- Is the result clear, specific, desirable, urgent?
- Weak signs: vague outcomes ("grow", "improve"), no measurable result
Perceived Likelihood
- Is there proof? Is the path clear? Is it believable?
- Weak signs: no testimonials, unclear process, big claims without support
Time Delay
- How fast do results happen? When is the first win?
- Weak signs: long delay before results, no quick wins
Effort & Sacrifice
- How hard does it feel? How many steps?
- Weak signs: too many steps, unclear instructions, heavy effort
Market Fit
- Is the audience specific? Is the pain urgent? Can they pay?
- Weak signs: "everyone" as target, low urgency problems
Offer Structure
- Is it easy to understand? Clear? Complete?
- Weak signs: messy structure, missing elements
Value Stack
- Is value clearly shown? Are bonuses meaningful?
- Weak signs: weak bonuses, no stacking, unclear value
Pricing
- Does price match value? Is it justified?
- Weak signs: random pricing, no anchoring
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 340 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A db2c6452743c
sub-value is an agent published in the GitHub repository alexsmedile/hormozi-skills (155 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 2,312 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-flow
FLOW framework prompt analyst. Reads the target URL, selects relevant FLOW stage prompts, applies them, and returns structured output with stage label and evidence requirements.
seo-local
Local SEO specialist. Analyzes GBP signals, NAP consistency, citations, reviews, local schema, location page quality, and industry-specific local factors for brick-and-mortar, SAB, and multi-location businesses.
seo-drift
SEO drift analysis agent. Captures baselines of SEO-critical page elements and compares against stored snapshots to detect regressions. Reports changes with severity classification. Only spawned when a drift baseline exists for the URL.
audit-creative
Cross-platform creative specialist. Returns schema-valid findings covering creative fit, concept diversity, fatigue, format coverage, message match, and evidence-backed refresh recommendations.
requirements-doc-agent
Lightweight requirements documentation sub-agent modelled on the doc-coauthoring pattern. Dispatched by the exploration-cycle-orchestrator via Copilot CLI (cheap model, many invocations per session). Each invocation handles one focused capture task: problem framing, business requirements, user stories…
debate-synthesizer
Multi-Agent Debate Judge. Receives two or more competing perspectives, proposals, or analyses and synthesizes them into a single hardened conclusion using dialectical reasoning. Resolves conflicts, names tradeoffs, and produces a final verdict.