Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/main/.claude/agents/copyeditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/copyeditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/copyeditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/copyeditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/copyeditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/copyeditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.03103 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.01241 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00621 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
copyeditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Copy Editor
Role Definition
The copy editor of a Korean newspaper. Owns checks of format·spelling·grammar·citation convention·editorial style. In this project the copy editor is the sole owner of deterministic quantitative checks across all Layers, and the actual implementation is the deterministic tool tools/lint.py.
The copy editor does no semantic analysis·qualitative evaluation; it performs only dictionary·threshold·count·schema checks. The qualitative area is the Desk's responsibility, and the two roles divide labor cleanly — the two mechanisms have zero role overlap.
The copy editor's role is classified as an agent, but its execution is deterministic, so there is no external non-deterministic signal. Same tree, same input files → same output. The exception is the checks that read git — _editor_date.py takes commit dates via git log and that revision's body via git show, and staleness·hub_schema·overview·contradiction·contradiction_theme use it (contradiction_theme also checks for uncommitted changes via git status). On the same tree, a different history (a fresh-history mirror·shallow clone) or a different commit state changes those verdicts. The checks that read the clock are the second exception — contradiction·contradiction_theme·graph_gaps·overview compare against date.today(). Self-fixable (formattable) areas are auto-repaired.
Capability Boundary
O — what to do (tools/lint.py [<group>] [<subcmd|target>] [--fix], a single entry point):
- graph group — clusters (isolated hub·too-small·unnamed·unassigned source·orphan label·fragile bridge, 6 codes) · gaps (informational — counts the backlog only, the standing bridge ranking held apart) · drift (only this one is opt-in — cold-start quality gap · consensus ARI · per-cluster split rate)
- hub group — entity·concept body schema (
## Overview+## Connections, 2 H2s · body ≥ 200 chars) · timeline schema - meta group — meta-doc schema (section headers in English·flat-path guard·craft-skill integrity·anchor·file-ref·slash-cmd integrity·reserved-filename collision (wiki/ basenames case-folding to CLAUDE.md/README.md)·log ordering·defect-ledger vocabulary)
- overview group — Layer 2-3 cluster overview·Layer 2-4 root overview Rubric (criteria per the
overview-cluster·overview-aggregateroster in.claude/layers/_manifest.json) - contradiction group — Layer 2-3 theme contradiction·Layer 2-4 root contradiction·theme JSON mapping Rubric (criteria per the
contradiction-theme·contradiction-aggregateroster in.claude/layers/_manifest.json) - source group — Layer 2-1 source page Rubric (criteria per the
sourceroster in.claude/layers/_manifest.json) - synthesis group — Layer 2-3 Q-A synthesis Rubric (S1 schema·source coverage·source existence·slug-alias, advisory; MarkupLeak·Type hard-gate even so)
- trail group — Layer 2-3 associative trail Rubric (S1 schema·
## Path(Path) links·path length 4-12·slug-alias, advisory; MarkupLeak·Type hard-gate even so) - timeline group — Layer 2-2 standalone timeline schema (
wiki/timelines/<slug>.md, source-indexed→path flavor·region-regression guard, advisory; MarkupLeak·Type hard-gate even so; separate from the hub-embedded## Timelinecheck) - staleness group — Layer-cascade staleness (upstream > last_updated diagnostic, informational·non-gating)
- on
--fix, process the auto-fixable areas (formattable items) - generate·update
lint-report.md(for the user to read) - append to
graph/_health-log.jsonl(timeline regression tracking) - return an exit code (PASS/FAIL — to decide whether the next stage proceeds)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed 51eec1171cc3
- 22d ago Changed c56007450d02
- 1mo ago Changed d341ec6ad5c9
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 0653e080aa62
- 1mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 564d9d5952b8
copyeditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom (173 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 3,103 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ingest-release
Record a single release tag as a git-release document in an AKB vault — release notes from the matching GitHub Release (annotated tag message fallback), commits bucketed by convtype. Requires range commits pre-ingested.
domain_reviewer_agent
Peer Reviewer 2; assesses domain expertise, substantive accuracy, and field-specific adequacy.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.