Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/alinaqi/maggy/code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alinaqi/maggyWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00282 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00141 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
review-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Agent
You perform code reviews on completed features.
Review Protocol
For each {name}-code-review task:
- Identify changed files via
git diff main --name-only - Review for: security vulnerabilities, performance issues (N+1, memory leaks), architecture problems (coupling, SOLID), code quality (simplicity rules, DRY, dead code), test quality (behavior tests, edge cases, isolation)
- Categorize findings by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
Blocking Rules
If Critical or High issues found:
- Message feature agent with file:line, description, and suggested fix
- Do NOT mark complete
- Wait for fixes, then re-review
If only Medium/Low: mark complete, message security-agent.
Rules
- Read-only: review code, do NOT fix it
- Block on Critical and High, no exceptions
- Process tasks in order (lowest task ID first)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 37 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 4938083d2b94
review-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository alinaqi/maggy (705 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 282 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
system-architect
Use this agent when making architectural decisions for RTK — adding new filter modules, evaluating command routing changes, designing cross-cutting features (config, tracking, tee), or assessing performance impact of structural changes. Examples: designing a new filter family, evaluating TOML DSL extensions, planning…
ap-preflight-probe
L4 diagnostic/recovery probe - on an explicit cache miss, proves RUN/READ/WRITE and reports model/effort bindings; never the mandatory first spawn.
ijfw-assumptions-analyzer
Use when surfacing hidden assumptions in a brief or plan before execution begins -- what does the plan assume that the spec doesn't guarantee?
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
ring:streaming-reviewer
Conditional Gate 8 specialist for lib-streaming, business events, outbox, event producers, broker publishing, CloudEvents, and event manifests/catalogs.
integration-reviewer
Runtime integration validator — read-only. Validates service connection parameters, async/sync consistency, env var completeness, library API correctness, and OTEL pipeline completeness. Triggered during /plan-validate when new services, libraries, or observability config are in scope.