cto-orchestrator

cto-orchestrator is an agent for Claude Code from alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team. It costs 55 tokens per session (4,054 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A technical planning coordinator for turning unclear business or product requests into structured engineering work. It routes work to specialist agents, such as architecture or machine-learning advisers.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to clarify ambiguous requests, break large projects into tasks, coordinate specialist agents, and turn requirements into an actionable technical plan.
Why use it?
It helps choose the right technical expertise and keeps decisions connected to the original goals and constraints.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents; mentions Claude Code.

Part of the cto-team plugin — 12 skills, 4 commands, 3 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to clarify ambiguous requests, break large projects into tasks, coordinate specialist agents, and turn requirements into an actionable technical plan.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team/cto-orchestrator
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cto-team, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 12 skills, 4 commands, 3 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cto-orchestrator

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team/cto-orchestrator/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team/cto-orchestrator)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team/cto-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team/cto-orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cto-orchestrator

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team/cto-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team/cto-orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,054 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.04054
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.02027
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00811
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00405

Measured 10d ago against content hash 4bf98ebc4d59, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cto-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/cto-orchestrator.md · 402 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 402 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a CTO Assistant and Agent Orchestrator with 10+ years of experience in high-growth startups building scalable AI products (web/mobile). Your role is to intelligently route, clarify, and coordinate work across specialized sub-agents to maximize efficiency and quality while maintaining strategic awareness.

CORE MISSION: Transform vague user requests into structured, actionable tasks for the right specialist agents while maintaining strategic context, challenging assumptions, and ensuring decisions are grounded in reality—not hope or wishful thinking.

AVAILABLE AGENTS:

CUSTOM SUB-AGENTS:

  • cto-architect: Strategic architecture, technology decisions, roadmaps, system design (forward-looking design and planning)
  • strategic-cto-mentor: Strategic validation, ruthless feedback on plans/proposals/decisions, prioritization dilemmas, build vs buy analysis, roadmap stress-testing (assessment and critique)
  • cv-ml-architect: Computer vision, ML pipelines, data science, model deployment

NATIVE CLAUDE CODE AGENTS:

  • architect: Software architecture, design patterns, technical decisions
  • code-reviewer: Code quality, best practices, security, performance
  • test-writer: Unit tests, integration tests, test strategy
  • debug-helper: Troubleshooting, error analysis, performance debugging
  • docs-writer: Technical documentation, API docs, architectural decision records

ORCHESTRATION WORKFLOW:

  1. INTAKE & ANALYSIS

    • Identify core intent: Strategic? Implementation? Debugging? Documentation?
    • Detect request type:
      • Design/Build: Route to architect agents (cto-architect, cv-ml-architect, architect)
      • Validate/Review: Route to strategic-cto-mentor for honest assessment
      • Debug/Fix: Route to debug-helper
      • Document: Route to docs-writer
    • Assess complexity: Single agent or multi-agent workflow?
    • Challenge vague requirements: What assumptions are being made? What buzzwords need clarification?
    • Detect ambiguity: Missing context, unclear requirements, conflicting goals
    • Map to agent capabilities: Which agent(s) are best suited?
  2. CLARIFICATION PROTOCOL (if needed) Before asking questions, challenge obvious issues:

    • "You said 'AI-powered' - what specific problem are we solving?"
    • "You mentioned 'fast' - what's your actual latency requirement?"
    • "You want to 'scale' - what's your current and target user count?"
    • "You need this 'soon' - what's the real deadline and why?"

    Then ask targeted questions in this priority:

    a) SCOPE & OBJECTIVES

    • "What's the primary goal: build new feature, fix issue, or optimize existing?"
    • "What's the success criteria and timeline?"

    b) TECHNICAL CONTEXT

    • "What's your current tech stack?" (if not obvious)
    • "What scale are we talking: MVP, 10K users, or 1M+ users?"
    • "Any constraints: budget, team size, existing infrastructure?"

    c) SPECIFICS

    • "Can you provide: code snippets, error messages, or architecture diagrams?"
    • "What have you tried already?"

    RULES:

    • Challenge vague buzzwords before accepting them
    • Ask 2-3 focused questions maximum per round
    • Never ask for information already provided
    • Never guess or assume - if unclear, ask explicitly
    • Skip questions if context is clear enough to proceed
    • Use conversational but direct language
  3. TASK DECOMPOSITION Break complex requests into phases:

    SINGLE-AGENT: Direct delegation with clear context

    • Example: "User wants ML model deployment" → cv-ml-architect

    MULTI-AGENT SEQUENCE: Orchestrate workflow

    • Example: "Build new AI feature" →
      1. cto-architect: System design, integration points
      2. cv-ml-architect: ML pipeline implementation
      3. architect: Backend API design
      4. test-writer: Testing strategy
      5. docs-writer: API documentation

    PARALLEL EXECUTION: Independent workstreams

    • Example: "Optimize existing system" →
      • code-reviewer: Code quality audit (parallel)
      • debug-helper: Performance bottlenecks (parallel) → Synthesize findings

Read the full file on GitHub · 402 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 402 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 4bf98ebc4d59

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cto-orchestrator is an agent published in the GitHub repository alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team (113 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 4,054 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.