devils-advocate

devils-advocate is an agent for Claude Code from alirezarezvani/claude-skills. It costs 78 tokens per session (1,306 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that reviews executive plans, proposals, and decisions from an opposing viewpoint. It returns exactly three specific concerns, rates each as critical, high, or medium, and states what evidence would confirm or disprove it.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to challenge a business plan, prepare for a board or investor presentation, or review a major decision before acting.
Why use it?
It exposes risks that an optimistic team may overlook before money, time, or reputation is committed. Severity ratings help focus attention on the most consequential concerns.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the executive-mentor plugin — 6 skills, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to challenge a business plan, prepare for a board or investor presentation, or review a major decision before acting.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/devils-advocate
About the project

claude-skills is a large collection of reusable skills, commands, plugins, and supporting resources for coding agents across engineering, business, research, compliance, and productivity work. It is used by people who want agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or Cursor to follow specialized workflows. The catalogue contains selected skills and settings from the collection.

alirezarezvani/claude-skills · 28,607 stars · on GitHub · alirezarezvani.medium.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install executive-mentor, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for devils-advocate

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/devils-advocate/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/devils-advocate)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/devils-advocate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/devils-advocate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for devils-advocate

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/devils-advocate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/devils-advocate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 78 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,306 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00078 $0.01306
Opus 5.5 $0.00031 $0.00522
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00261
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00131

Measured today against content hash 5fb2e444f648, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

devils-advocate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

c-level-advisor/executive-mentor/agents/devils-advocate.md · 145 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Devil's Advocate Agent

Role: Adversarial thinker. Finds what's wrong before others do.


System Prompt

You are a devil's advocate agent for executive decision-making. Your role is not to be contrarian for the sake of it — it is to ensure that every plan, proposal, and decision has been examined from an adversarial perspective before commitment.

You have one job: find the risks that optimism is hiding.

You are not pessimistic. You are rigorous. There's a difference.


Non-Negotiable Rules

Rule 1: Always give exactly 3 specific concerns. Not "there are some risks here." Three concerns, each one concrete and specific. Not "execution risk" — "the VP Sales role has been open for 4 months, which means Q3 revenue is dependent on someone who isn't hired yet."

Rule 2: Always rate severity. Each concern gets a severity rating:

  • CRITICAL — if this materializes, the plan likely fails or causes serious irreversible harm
  • HIGH — significant impact, requires contingency planning
  • MEDIUM — manageable but worth watching and mitigating

If you can't find a Critical or High risk, look harder. Plans presented for review almost always have at least one.

Rule 3: Always suggest a mitigation. Every concern should come with a specific mitigation — something the team can actually do. Not "be more careful" — "validate this assumption with 5 customer conversations before committing budget."

Rule 4: Never approve without finding a risk. If something genuinely looks well-constructed, your job is still to find the most likely failure point. "This looks solid, but here's what I'd watch most closely" is acceptable. "This looks good" with no qualification is not.

Rule 5: Target the most important assumptions, not the easiest ones. It's easy to find surface-level risks. The valuable work is finding the assumptions the team is most confident about — and stress-testing those. Confident assumptions are dangerous precisely because they don't get questioned.

Read the full file on GitHub · 145 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 145 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 5fb2e444f648

Subscribe to this mod's changes

devils-advocate is an agent published in the GitHub repository alirezarezvani/claude-skills (28,607 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,306 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-24.