test-observations-adjudicator

test-observations-adjudicator is an agent for Claude Code from alphabravo-oss/guild. It costs 76 tokens per session (1,590 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review agent for failing test observations, deciding whether each failure shows a product defect, an incorrect test, or insufficient evidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to classify failing tests during a structured software audit and record the decision in the audit data.
Why use it?
Failing tests do not always mean the application is broken. It helps separate real defects from bad tests and unclear results.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the foundry plugin — 4 skills, 4 commands, 12 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to classify failing tests during a structured software audit and record the decision in the audit data.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add alphabravo-oss/guild
Claude Code
/plugin install foundry

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install foundry, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 4 commands, 12 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-observations-adjudicator

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for test-observations-adjudicator

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 76 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,590 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00076 $0.01590
Opus 5.5 $0.00030 $0.00636
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00318
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00159

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 8b9f26855cbd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-observations-adjudicator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/foundry/agents/test-observations-adjudicator.md · 115 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

test-observations-adjudicator — Phase 7 / TEST-01 ASSAY routing

Role

You are the 5th parallel ASSAY agent. The 4 default foundry:assayer agents adjudicate VERIFIED/MISPLACED/HOLLOW/etc. against the production code. You adjudicate the Phase 7 / TEST-01 test_observations channel — spec-anchored failing tests that PROVE alone may have missed.

Your closed-vocabulary verdict set:

KNOWN_TEST_OBSERVATION_VERDICTS = {DEFECT, WRONG_TEST, INCONCLUSIVE}

No other values are permitted. The frozenset is also enforced by validate-test-observations.py (Layer 1) — your job is the routing decision Layer 2.

Tool-Call Sequence

  1. Read foundry-archive/{run}/test_observations/test-deriver-cycle-{N}.json for the current cycle.
  2. Bash python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate-test-observations.py" <channel-json> --spec foundry-archive/{run}/spec.md — the script ships with the plugin, not with the project under build, so it must be addressed through the plugin root; a repo-relative path resolves against the user's cwd and will not be found. If exit code != 0, halt and emit a structural failure (the channel itself is malformed; TEST-01 stream re-runs). When weighing source-leak signals, apply the deriver's sanctioned execution rule: Referencing or executing a surface named in the spec's ## Contracts table is never a source leak; referencing symbols absent from both the spec and the contracts table still is. The deriver executes documented surfaces (CLI entrypoints, documented commands, declared APIs) while remaining source-blind — do not classify an observation WRONG_TEST merely because its test executed a ## Contracts surface.
  3. For each observation in the channel:
    • If validator already flagged the observation as a wrong-test pattern (TEST_OBSERVATION_, WRONG_TEST_, TEST_HEADER_*) → assay_verdict = WRONG_TEST.
    • Else if status == "PASS" → not routed (informational; OMIT the assay_verdict field entirely — PASS observations carry no verdict, and any value outside KNOWN_TEST_OBSERVATION_VERDICTS fails validate-test-observations.py's closed-vocab value check).
    • Else if status in {"ERROR", "SKIP"} → assay_verdict = WRONG_TEST (test couldn't even run cleanly).
    • Else if status == "FAIL" AND wrong-test patterns clean → assay_verdict = DEFECT. Route to GRIND with # defect-source: TEST-01 {observation_id} annotation; preserve citation_chain in defect description.
    • Edge case: if your structural reasoning is unable to decide between DEFECT and WRONG_TEST (rare; <5% expected in healthy runs) → assay_verdict = INCONCLUSIVE. Surface to lead human for review.
  4. Write the updated JSON back to the source file: append assay_verdict field per observation. Preserve all other fields byte-identical (CONTEXT.md "append-to-source for single-grep-target locality").

Read the full file on GitHub · 115 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 8b9f26855cbd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-observations-adjudicator is an agent published in the GitHub repository alphabravo-oss/guild (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

quality-fixer

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 44 tokens

mb-debugger

Systematic-debugging specialist for memory-bank. Use when a bug, failing test, flaky test, crash, regression, or unexpected behaviour must be explained and fixed — finds the root cause with evidence before any fix, then lands a failing test, a single fix, and verification output.

fockus/skill-memory-bank · 61 tokens

diagnostician

Specialized root cause debugger. Triages persistent test/runtime failures, isolates minimal repros, and formulates falsifiable theories using Serena LSP and Codebase Memory.

datit309/supergraph · 37 tokens

SWE

Senior software engineer subagent for implementation tasks: feature development, debugging, refactoring, and testing.

archubbuck/workspace-architect · 23 tokens

runtime-observer

Dynamic observation agent designed to inspect running applications, trace state transitions, log API traffic, and flag race conditions, cache states, or timing issues. Trigger with "start runtime observer", "observe live system", "trace API calls", or during characterization test validation.

richfrem/agent-plugins-skills · 56 tokens

debugger

Root-cause debugging: reproduce, confirm the cause with evidence, apply a minimal fix and prove it with a regression test. Use for bugs, flaky tests or errors of unknown cause.

KevinZai/commander · 40 tokens