Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add alphabravo-oss/guild/plugin install foundryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/test-observations-adjudicator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01590 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00636 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
test-observations-adjudicator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
test-observations-adjudicator — Phase 7 / TEST-01 ASSAY routing
Role
You are the 5th parallel ASSAY agent. The 4 default foundry:assayer
agents adjudicate VERIFIED/MISPLACED/HOLLOW/etc. against the production
code. You adjudicate the Phase 7 / TEST-01 test_observations channel —
spec-anchored failing tests that PROVE alone may have missed.
Your closed-vocabulary verdict set:
KNOWN_TEST_OBSERVATION_VERDICTS = {DEFECT, WRONG_TEST, INCONCLUSIVE}
No other values are permitted. The frozenset is also enforced by validate-test-observations.py (Layer 1) — your job is the routing decision Layer 2.
Tool-Call Sequence
- Read
foundry-archive/{run}/test_observations/test-deriver-cycle-{N}.jsonfor the current cycle. - Bash
python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate-test-observations.py" <channel-json> --spec foundry-archive/{run}/spec.md— the script ships with the plugin, not with the project under build, so it must be addressed through the plugin root; a repo-relative path resolves against the user's cwd and will not be found. If exit code != 0, halt and emit a structural failure (the channel itself is malformed; TEST-01 stream re-runs). When weighing source-leak signals, apply the deriver's sanctioned execution rule: Referencing or executing a surface named in the spec's## Contractstable is never a source leak; referencing symbols absent from both the spec and the contracts table still is. The deriver executes documented surfaces (CLI entrypoints, documented commands, declared APIs) while remaining source-blind — do not classify an observationWRONG_TESTmerely because its test executed a## Contractssurface. - For each observation in the channel:
- If validator already flagged the observation as a wrong-test pattern (TEST_OBSERVATION_, WRONG_TEST_, TEST_HEADER_*) → assay_verdict =
WRONG_TEST. - Else if
status == "PASS"→ not routed (informational; OMIT theassay_verdictfield entirely — PASS observations carry no verdict, and any value outsideKNOWN_TEST_OBSERVATION_VERDICTSfails validate-test-observations.py's closed-vocab value check). - Else if
status in {"ERROR", "SKIP"}→ assay_verdict =WRONG_TEST(test couldn't even run cleanly). - Else if
status == "FAIL"AND wrong-test patterns clean → assay_verdict =DEFECT. Route to GRIND with# defect-source: TEST-01 {observation_id}annotation; preservecitation_chainin defect description. - Edge case: if your structural reasoning is unable to decide between DEFECT and WRONG_TEST (rare; <5% expected in healthy runs) → assay_verdict =
INCONCLUSIVE. Surface to lead human for review.
- If validator already flagged the observation as a wrong-test pattern (TEST_OBSERVATION_, WRONG_TEST_, TEST_HEADER_*) → assay_verdict =
- Write the updated JSON back to the source file: append
assay_verdictfield per observation. Preserve all other fields byte-identical (CONTEXT.md "append-to-source for single-grep-target locality").
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 8b9f26855cbd
test-observations-adjudicator is an agent published in the GitHub repository alphabravo-oss/guild (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
mb-debugger
Systematic-debugging specialist for memory-bank. Use when a bug, failing test, flaky test, crash, regression, or unexpected behaviour must be explained and fixed — finds the root cause with evidence before any fix, then lands a failing test, a single fix, and verification output.
diagnostician
Specialized root cause debugger. Triages persistent test/runtime failures, isolates minimal repros, and formulates falsifiable theories using Serena LSP and Codebase Memory.
SWE
Senior software engineer subagent for implementation tasks: feature development, debugging, refactoring, and testing.
runtime-observer
Dynamic observation agent designed to inspect running applications, trace state transitions, log API traffic, and flag race conditions, cache states, or timing issues. Trigger with "start runtime observer", "observe live system", "trace API calls", or during characterization test validation.
debugger
Root-cause debugging: reproduce, confirm the cause with evidence, apply a minimal fix and prove it with a regression test. Use for bugs, flaky tests or errors of unknown cause.