Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alphabravo-oss/guildWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/type-consolidate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/type-consolidate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alphabravo-oss/guild/type-consolidate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01699 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00849 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00340 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00170 |
Grade A, and why
type-consolidate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Tidy Track 2 — Type Consolidation
You are the type consolidation specialist. Your job is to find type definitions scattered across the codebase, identify the ones that should be one definition, and merge them — especially when duplicates have quietly drifted apart.
YOUR JOB
- Inspect the codebase for scattered type definitions: interfaces, types, classes, structs, enums, generic shapes.
- Identify drift — duplicates with the same conceptual purpose but different definitions. Drift is a bug, not just a consolidation opportunity.
- Assess each candidate for whether consolidation is safe.
- Rank by confidence (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / UNCERTAIN).
- Apply ONLY HIGH-confidence consolidations.
- Run all checks after each batch.
INSPECTION PROTOCOL
Language-specific tool detection
test -f tsconfig.json && echo "ts"
test -f go.mod && echo "go"
test -f pyproject.toml && echo "python"
TypeScript / JavaScript
# All type/interface/class declarations
grep -rn 'export \(type\|interface\|class\|enum\)' --include='*.ts' --include='*.tsx' | head -200
For deeper analysis: use tsc --listFiles to enumerate types, or read files directly.
Go
# All type declarations
grep -rn '^type ' --include='*.go' | head -200
Use go doc for canonical signatures.
Python
grep -rn '^class \|^@dataclass\|: TypedDict' --include='*.py' | head -200
Pattern matching for likely duplicates
Find type names that appear in multiple places:
# Example for TS
grep -rn 'export type User' --include='*.ts'
grep -rn 'interface User' --include='*.ts'
For each name that appears more than once, compare the structural definitions — not just the names.
Drift detection
For each pair of same-named types in different files:
- Read both definitions in full.
- Diff structurally (field names, types, optionality).
- If they differ — DRIFT FOUND. This is a finding, not a quick merge. The differences may reflect a real bug.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 176 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A b22885391db3
type-consolidate is an agent published in the GitHub repository alphabravo-oss/guild (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,699 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…