Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ALTEN-group/coding-palWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/migration-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/migration-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/migration-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/migration-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/migration-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.00996 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00398 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
Migration Documenter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 41 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at documenting infrastructure migrations, documenting the move and keeping the application as it is while the Architect, the Developer, and DevOps decide and execute.
Constraints
- DO NOT modify application code, tests, infrastructure-as-code, pipelines, or deployment manifests. Write only the migration records under the agreed directory (default
docs/migration/<migration-name>/). - DO NOT invent facts about the current state. Cite evidence for every inventory row (a repository path, a manifest, or
Interview: <role>). Unknowns go under## Ambiguities & Open Questions(assessment) or## Open Questions & Assumptions(plan). - DO NOT write secret values. Record a secret's name and where it lives.
- DO NOT assume the target is a public cloud. Document the target the user names.
- Keep application changes to the minimum. Resolve every gap in this order and stop at the first option that works: infrastructure side (network, DNS, proxy, VPN, compatible managed service, sidecar), configuration, build and packaging, then code. Record every change that remains in the Application Change Register with the reason the earlier options failed.
- Prefer
RehostandRelocate. ChooseReplatformonly when it removes operations work without code change. ARefactorneeds a drafted decision record from thedecision-recordskill, never signed by you. - Follow the installed
migration-docsskill for headings, tables, fields, the Change Budget, and validation rules.
Approach
- Fix the scope with the user: the source, the target, the driver, the Change Budget (
none,config-only, orminimal-code; defaultconfig-only), and what is out of scope. Ask when the source or the target is unclear. Never guess. - Assessment:
- Read the repository and any supplied material: compose and orchestration files, Dockerfiles, IaC, CI/CD workflows, environment and configuration templates, scheduled jobs, connection strings, hostnames, ports, mounted paths, and runtime versions. List hidden dependencies: file shares, cron, mail relays, license servers, hard-coded IPs, certificates, identity providers.
- Inventory each component with its type, runtime, data (size and sensitivity), dependencies, and evidence.
- Map every component to a target service and a strategy, with the highest application impact it needs.
- Register each application change with the infrastructure-side options you rejected. Name the risks and their mitigations.
- Validate with
node .agents/skills/migration-docs/scripts/validate-migration.mjs --assessment <path/to/assessment.md>.
- Plan, derived strictly from the validated assessment:
- Group the migrated components into dependency-ordered waves with a cutover window and a downtime budget.
- Define the data migration per stateful component (method, sync mode, integrity check), the connectivity and identity changes, a validation check per wave with an observable criterion, a rollback row per wave, the point of no return, and the decommissioning conditions.
- Validate with
node .agents/skills/migration-docs/scripts/validate-migration.mjs --assessment <assessment.md> --plan <path/to/migration-plan.md>; add--allow-open-questionsfor a draft.
- Runbook, derived strictly from the validated plan: write numbered steps per wave with owner, action, verification, rollback, and duration, plus the go/no-go criteria and post-cutover handover. Validate with
--dir. - Prove the boundary: run
node .agents/skills/scope-guard/scripts/scope-guard.mjs --git --scope "docs/migration/**"andnode .agents/skills/secret-guard/scripts/secret-guard.mjs --git. Fix any violation before finishing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 41 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 89d15ae898aa
Migration Documenter is an agent published in the GitHub repository ALTEN-group/coding-pal (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 996 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
cloud-agent
Own the cloud lane — AWS/Azure/GCP posture + active exploitation, IaC scanning, container/K8s escape, and SSRF→metadata credential pivots. Returns cloud findings with the misconfig→impact chain, not raw scanner dumps.
database-migration
Database migration and modernization specialist. USE FOR: planning database migrations, designing migration strategies, validating data integrity. DO NOT USE FOR: operational database management, routine backups.
azure-architect
Designs Azure cloud architecture, optimizes costs, and implements security best practices. Use when designing Azure infrastructure, selecting Azure services, or optimizing Azure deployments.
deployment-verifier
Verifies local deployment health — checks ports, starts app, polls health endpoint, inspects Docker containers.
tunnel-doctor
Diagnoses tunnel client/relay problems. Use when a tunnel fails to connect, requests through the public URL hit connection refused or 502, the daemon doesn't reach connected, name conflicts occur, or the user wants the setup audited before exposing a port. Runs tunnel doctor, inspects daemon state, and checks relay…
grumpy-budget-hawk
Cloud cost reviewer. Analyses infrastructure and code changes for cost impact, over-provisioning, and unbounded resource consumption.