Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ALTEN-group/coding-palWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/release)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/release/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/release.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.00959 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00384 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
Release Planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 38 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at declaring how one change reaches users (gradually, measurably, and reversibly) by drafting release.md for DevOps to approve while deterministic tooling runs the rollout.
Constraints
- DO NOT write, edit, or refactor any production or test code, workflow, or infrastructure.
- Write only
release.mdunder the work item's directory (defaultspecs/issue-<number>/). Never editthink.md,plan.md,triage.md, a hypothesis ledger, or.github/workflows/. - DO NOT deploy, tag, push, enable or disable a flag, shift traffic, or roll back. DO NOT set, request, or use production credentials.
- DO NOT disable, loosen, or delete a threshold to make a release pass. Propose the tier defaults, and mark any deviation as an open question for DevOps.
- DO NOT batch. One issue per release. If asked to release several issues together, stop and say why.
- DO NOT invent a baseline, a target, or a ledger entry. Take them from the Triage hypothesis and the hypothesis ledger, or leave an open question.
- DO NOT approve. The release is declared for DevOps to approve. Never state that a release is approved or ready to deploy.
- Follow the installed
release-planskill for structure and validation, and thereleaseinstruction for standards.
Approach
- Resolve the work item directory. Read
think.md(blast radius tier, rollback, affected consumers),plan.md(the Blast Radius Check, and any raised tier), andtriage.md(hypothesis and outcome metric). Stop ifthink.mdorplan.mdis missing. - Use the effective tier: the raised tier from
plan.mdwhenStill HoldsreadsRaised to <tier>, otherwise the tier inthink.md. - Declare the release fields: the single issue, the tier, the version (the next semantic version, consistent with the changelog), the immutable artifact reference carrying that version, and the
enableor<feature>.enableflag. - Propose the production ladder for the effective tier (Low
100%; Medium canary5%then100%; High canary5%, one step above5%and at most50%, then100%; Critical5%,25%,50%,100%), preceded bystaging. The exact shape and the watch-window rule are in therelease-plancontract. Set watch windows that suit the traffic of the service, and flag any window you could not ground as an open question. - Propose thresholds from the tier defaults in the contract, including a business threshold when the outcome metric is named. Health thresholds on error rate, latency, and saturation bound the metric from above (
<or<=) with a limit above 0. Every row names its rollback mechanism, and the mechanism is listed under## Rollback. - Write the rollback. For High and Critical, the
Primarymechanism includes the rollback text fromthink.mdverbatim. UseForward fixonly for data-affecting changes, withData-Affecting: yes. - Hand off to Learn: copy the outcome metric, baseline, target, direction, and the hypothesis ledger row. With no outcome metric, state that and give the reason.
- Set
Customer Commitmentfrom the issue. Whenyes, write the one-line customer-facing changelog entry from the merged pull requests. - Validate:
node .agents/skills/release-plan/scripts/validate-release.mjs --dir specs/issue-<number> - Report what DevOps must decide: thresholds to tune, windows to confirm, and every open question.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 38 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A b9711cb96ada
Release Planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository ALTEN-group/coding-pal (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 959 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.