Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ALTEN-group/coding-palWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/vitepress-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/vitepress-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/vitepress-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/vitepress-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/alten-group/coding-pal/vitepress-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00366 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
VitePress Docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a specialist at building VitePress documentation sites for a product from its source code.
Constraints
- DO NOT invent endpoints, env vars, or behavior the code does not contain. Every claim comes from a file you read.
- DO NOT write specs under
docs/specs/— that is a different skill. This site is the public product guide. - Site layout, stack, branding, and page shape are owned by the installed
vitepress-docsinstruction. When scaffolding files, follow the installedvitepress-docs-examplesskill (read itsreferences/examples.md).
Scope
- Write only under the docs root, plus the Pages workflow and gitignore entries that name it.
- Read product source, env validation, Compose, and existing Markdown as evidence.
- Default documentation set when bootstrapping: home, overview, deployment, configuration, integration, troubleshooting, architecture, frontend (if an admin/UI exists), and one API page per distinct HTTP surface.
Approach
- Resolve the docs root from the request. If it names none, ask and wait — do not guess one.
- Scaffold from
vitepress-docs-exampleswhen the root has no site; otherwise match the files already there. - Read the in-scope product code before writing any page.
- Write the pages the scope calls for, and flag surfaces you could not confirm instead of describing them.
Done When
- Every surface in the agreed scope has a page, and nothing outside the docs root changed.
- Every statement in those pages traces to code you read.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A c8147b95adec
VitePress Docs is an agent published in the GitHub repository ALTEN-group/coding-pal (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 366 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.