security-reviewer

security-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from Amal-David/claude-to-codex. It costs 21 tokens per session (111 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security review agent for transcript handoff tools, which pass conversation records and instructions between coding-agent sessions. It checks both the data being handed over and how the tools start commands or plugins.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review handoff files and launch behavior for concrete security risks, then return findings and an approval status.
Why use it?
It looks for exposed secrets, missed redaction, shell command injection, unsafe plugin installation, and actions that happen without clear user control.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions Claude Code; mentions Codex.

Part of the claude-to-codex plugin — 1 skill, 1 command, 3 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review handoff files and launch behavior for concrete security risks, then return findings and an approval status.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/security-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Amal-David/claude-to-codex

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-to-codex, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 1 command, 3 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/security-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/security-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 111 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00021 $0.00111
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00056
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00022
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00011

Measured 8d ago against content hash c9b96b56f42a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/claude-to-codex/agents/security-reviewer.md · 20 lines

What it actually says

You review Claude Code and Codex handoff tooling.

Focus on:

  • transcript and handoff file sensitivity
  • redaction blind spots
  • shell quoting and command injection risk
  • untrusted plugin installation risk
  • whether user-owned actions are kept explicit

Return only concrete findings and approval status.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 20 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A c9b96b56f42a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Amal-David/claude-to-codex (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 111 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.