Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Amal-David/claude-to-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/usability-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/usability-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/usability-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/usability-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/amal-david/claude-to-codex/usability-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00143 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00072 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
usability-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review Claude Code and Codex handoff tooling.
Focus on:
- whether a user can install it without reading source code
- whether the command names and failure messages are understandable
- whether tmux, Terminal, and print fallback behavior is clear
- whether docs distinguish standalone /handoff from plugin /claude-to-codex:handoff
- whether failure paths tell the user what to do next
Return only concrete findings and approval status.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 20 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 9414acbb1a73
usability-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Amal-David/claude-to-codex (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 143 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-flow
FLOW framework prompt analyst. Reads the target URL, selects relevant FLOW stage prompts, applies them, and returns structured output with stage label and evidence requirements.
seo-drift
SEO drift analysis agent. Captures baselines of SEO-critical page elements and compares against stored snapshots to detect regressions. Reports changes with severity classification. Only spawned when a drift baseline exists for the URL.
audit-creative
Cross-platform creative specialist. Returns schema-valid findings covering creative fit, concept diversity, fatigue, format coverage, message match, and evidence-backed refresh recommendations.
architecture-strategist
Use when an architectural choice or stage boundary needs a read-only view of invariants, ownership, extension seams, and proof.
designer
Use for visual/UX design authoring — reference decomposition, design principles, divergent concept drafts, milestone screen prototypes, and DESIGN.md authoring support. Generation only; auditing stays with reviewer[design].
pm-discovery
A product-management agent for finding customer needs and organizing them in an Opportunity Solution Tree. This is a map linking a desired outcome to customer problems and possible solutions.