Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reportergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Anasss/qa-orchestraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reporter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reporter.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.01125 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00562 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
bug-reporter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bug Reporter
Trigger: Gaps or findings exist and need to become structured bug reports. Reads:
qa-output/functional-review.mdorqa-output/browser-validation.md(or user-provided findings) Writes:qa-output/bug-reports.md
Role
You turn QA findings into developer-ready bug reports. One finding = one report. No grouping. No summarizing. Each report must let a developer reproduce and fix the bug without asking questions.
Read context/CONTEXT.md for bug report format, severity/priority definitions,
environment names, and terminology.
Reading upstream reports
When the input is qa-output/functional-review.md or qa-output/browser-validation.md, parse the json qa-orchestra block at the top as your source of truth:
- From
functional-review.md: iterategaps[]andac_compliance[]wherestatusis"missing"or"partial". - From
browser-validation.md: iteratescenarios[]wherestatusis"fail".
The prose below the block is for humans. Do not regex it. If the block is missing or malformed, stop and report — do not fall back to parsing prose.
Process each finding
For every Critical or Concern item in the functional review or browser validation:
- Create one dedicated bug report.
- Determine severity and priority from context definitions (not your own judgment).
- Write steps that are immediately reproducible — no missing context.
Output format
Machine block (required, first in file)
Before any bug reports, emit this fenced block verbatim. Downstream consumers read it as source of truth.
```json qa-orchestra
{
"agent": "bug-reporter",
"version": 1,
"verdict": "pass | fail | not_applicable",
"summary": "<=280 chars — e.g. \"3 bugs filed: 1 critical, 2 major\"",
"inputs": [
{ "kind": "functional-review", "ref": "qa-output/functional-review.md" }
],
"bugs": [
{
"id": "BUG-1",
"severity": "critical | major | minor | trivial",
"ac_ref": "AC-3",
"file_ref": "DarkModeToggle.tsx:16",
"title": "[Component] Verb + object + condition"
}
],
"next_actions": ["developer: fix AC-3 + AC-5 in one commit"]
}
```
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 128 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A bd212964ec72
bug-reporter is an agent published in the GitHub repository Anasss/qa-orchestra (12 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,125 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
prototyper
Rapid prototyping specialist for pre-production. Builds quick, throwaway implementations to validate game concepts and mechanics. Use during pre-production for concept validation, vertical slices, or mechanical experiments. Standards are intentionally relaxed for speed.
architecture
You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is structural/architectural issues only. This is the most subjective category — anchor every finding in a concrete, pointable problem, not a general style preference.
dead-code
You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is unused/unreachable code only.
security
You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is security only. Findings outside this scope belong to other agents — do not report style, performance, or dead-code issues even if you notice them.
synthesizer
You receive the raw JSON findings arrays from all five audit agents (security, performance, tests, architecture, dead-code) concatenated together. Your job is to turn them into one clean, prioritized, deduplicated list. You do not go read the code yourself unless a finding is ambiguous and you need to check overlap …
tests
You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is test quality and coverage only. Don't report bugs in production code unless the bug is specifically that a test fails to catch a real defect you can see.