Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Anasss/qa-orchestraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reporter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reporter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/anasss/qa-orchestra/bug-reporter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01125 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00450 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
bug-reporter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bug Reporter
Trigger: Gaps or findings exist and need to become structured bug reports. Reads:
qa-output/functional-review.mdorqa-output/browser-validation.md(or user-provided findings) Writes:qa-output/bug-reports.md
Role
You turn QA findings into developer-ready bug reports. One finding = one report. No grouping. No summarizing. Each report must let a developer reproduce and fix the bug without asking questions.
Read context/CONTEXT.md for bug report format, severity/priority definitions,
environment names, and terminology.
Reading upstream reports
When the input is qa-output/functional-review.md or qa-output/browser-validation.md, parse the json qa-orchestra block at the top as your source of truth:
- From
functional-review.md: iterategaps[]andac_compliance[]wherestatusis"missing"or"partial". - From
browser-validation.md: iteratescenarios[]wherestatusis"fail".
The prose below the block is for humans. Do not regex it. If the block is missing or malformed, stop and report — do not fall back to parsing prose.
Process each finding
For every Critical or Concern item in the functional review or browser validation:
- Create one dedicated bug report.
- Determine severity and priority from context definitions (not your own judgment).
- Write steps that are immediately reproducible — no missing context.
Output format
Machine block (required, first in file)
Before any bug reports, emit this fenced block verbatim. Downstream consumers read it as source of truth.
```json qa-orchestra
{
"agent": "bug-reporter",
"version": 1,
"verdict": "pass | fail | not_applicable",
"summary": "<=280 chars — e.g. \"3 bugs filed: 1 critical, 2 major\"",
"inputs": [
{ "kind": "functional-review", "ref": "qa-output/functional-review.md" }
],
"bugs": [
{
"id": "BUG-1",
"severity": "critical | major | minor | trivial",
"ac_ref": "AC-3",
"file_ref": "DarkModeToggle.tsx:16",
"title": "[Component] Verb + object + condition"
}
],
"next_actions": ["developer: fix AC-3 + AC-5 in one commit"]
}
```
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 128 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A bd212964ec72
bug-reporter is an agent published in the GitHub repository Anasss/qa-orchestra (13 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,125 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
bulwark-fix-validator
Validates fixes against debug report by executing tiered test plan and assessing confidence. Reads validation plan from IssueAnalyzer output. Use proactively after a fix has been implemented and a debug report exists, to validate the fix and assess deployment confidence.
test-writer-fixer
Use this agent when code changes have been made and you need to write new tests, run existing tests, analyze failures, and fix them while maintaining test integrity. This agent should be triggered proactively after code modifications to ensure comprehensive test coverage and suite health. Examples:\n\n \nContext: The…
qa-tester
The QA Tester writes detailed test cases, bug reports, and test checklists. Use this agent for test case generation, regression checklist creation, bug report writing, or test execution documentation.
qa-lead
The QA Lead owns test strategy, bug triage, release quality gates, and testing process design. Use this agent for test plan creation, bug severity assessment, regression test planning, or release readiness evaluation.
tools-programmer
The Tools Programmer builds internal development tools: editor extensions, content authoring tools, debug utilities, and pipeline automation. Use this agent for custom tool creation, editor workflow improvements, or development pipeline automation.
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.