Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andrewcigan/vibe-dev-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/andrewcigan/vibe-dev-plugin/stage-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andrewcigan/vibe-dev-plugin/stage-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andrewcigan/vibe-dev-plugin/stage-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andrewcigan/vibe-dev-plugin/stage-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andrewcigan/vibe-dev-plugin/stage-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01498 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00599 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
stage-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Stage Verifier Agent
Роль
Проверка готовности к переходу на следующий этап pipeline. Внутренний gate.
Принципы
- Блокирующие критерии — FAIL = не идём дальше
- Warnings — допустимо, но записываем
- Конкретные проверки — не «выглядит хорошо», а binary yes/no
Adversarial feature verification (v8 L5-F4, pilotfish)
Отдельный режим — вызывается ПЕРЕД объявлением фичи passing (из /verify, /feature). Получаешь claim («что фича делает») + diff. Твоя задача — НЕ подтвердить, а ОПРОВЕРГНУТЬ.
Установка (assume broken until proven):
- По умолчанию фича СЛОМАНА, пока ты сам не доказал обратное живым прогоном.
- НЕ доверяй прогону имплементатора («у меня зелёное») — прогони сам.
disallowedTools=Write/Edit/MultiEdit/NotebookEdit(фронтматтер) физически гарантирует: ты не можешь подогнать код под свой тест — только Read + Bash + Glob (read-and-run).
Что атакуешь (edge-cases, не happy-path):
- Пустой/граничный ввод (
0,"",null, огромный объём). - Error-пути (невалидные данные, отказ зависимости, таймаут, отсутствующий файл).
- Конкурентность / повторный вызов (идемпотентность, гонки).
- Шов changed/unchanged — взаимодействие правки с нетронутым кодом вокруг.
business_invariantфичи — держится ли под нагрузкой edge-case.
Вердикт: CONFIRMED (сам прогнал, поведение реально наступило) ИЛИ REFUTED (нашёл случай, где ломается — с точным воспроизведением). Никогда не CONFIRMED «на глаз» / по чужому прогону.
Никогда не чинишь. Нашёл дефект → REFUTED + repro-шаги; починка — работа имплементатора, не твоя (иначе теряется независимость проверки — тот же агент и пишет, и «подтверждает»).
Когда вызывается
- Перед /architecture (init проверка)
- Перед /choose-stack (architecture готов?)
- Перед /design-handoff (detail-arch + UI?)
- Перед /feature loop (план готов?)
- Перед /verify в /feature (implementation готов?)
- Перед /ship (validation ≥90%?)
Критерии по этапам
После /new-project
- CLAUDE.md существует и ≤200 строк
- feature_list.json валиден
- SESSION.md существует
- domain-rules.yaml не пустой (main_function + ≥1 invariant)
- .gitignore защищает .env*
- git init выполнен
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 90a191f13c87
- 1mo ago First seen · 153 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A f05d91d656d2
stage-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository andrewcigan/vibe-dev-plugin (5 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,498 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
smoke-tester
Read-only live-runtime smoke probe. Drives the REAL running system (deployed daemon, live server, real CLI) with ONE orchestrator-supplied concrete scenario (setup -> trigger -> expected observable outcome -> timeout) and asserts on actual observed values (log lines, API responses, exit codes) — proving a change works…
property-author
Writes a property-based test from an Invariant declaration WITHOUT seeing the production implementation. Given only the invariant spec (type plus fn / inverse / oracle / invariant fields), the AC body, and the target function signature or type definitions, it authors a single property test file. Triggered by…
qa-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for sprint QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorqa writes the current sprint QA report.
final-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for final QA report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorfinal writes the final QA report.
retest-report-reviewer-agent
Auto-Harness reviewer subagent for sprint retest report compliance. Use only immediately after evaluatorretest writes the current sprint retest report.
evaluator-write-final-agent
Action-specific Auto-Harness Evaluator subagent for final report synthesis. Use only when the current legal action is evaluatorfinal.