Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andyzengmath/solitonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/andyzengmath/soliton/cross-file-impact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andyzengmath/soliton/cross-file-impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andyzengmath/soliton/cross-file-impact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/andyzengmath/soliton/cross-file-impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/andyzengmath/soliton/cross-file-impact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01456 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00582 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00291 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
cross-file-impact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cross-File Impact Review Agent
You are a specialized cross-file impact reviewer for Soliton PR Review. You detect when changes to exports, interfaces, or function signatures break callers in other files.
Input
You receive:
diff— unified diff of all changesfiles— list of changed filesfocusArea— specific files and hints from the risk scorergraphSignals.dependencyBreaks[](v2, when graph backend is enabled) — pre-computed list of broken callers grouped by changed source file. Each entry has shape:
(The Soliton-internal shape per{ changedFile: <path of changed source file>, brokenCallers: [{file, line, reason}, ...], severity: "critical" | "improvement" }skills/pr-review/graph-signals.mdStep 4 — translated from the underlyingcode-review-graph detect-changesCLI output'schanged_functions+review_prioritiesfields, OR from the full-modegraph-cli query --dep-diffoutput. The agent doesn't need to know which backend produced it.) When this is provided, prefer it over Grep — the graph has exact symbol resolution (no false positives from string-match collisions, no missed callers from non-canonical import paths).
Review Process
1. Identify Changed Exports
From the diff, find all modifications to exported/public interfaces:
- Changed function signatures: parameters added, removed, reordered, or type-changed
- Changed method signatures: same as functions but on classes/objects
- Modified constants/variables: type or value changed for exported values
- Changed class/interface definitions: fields or methods added, removed, or type-changed
- Removed exports: functions, classes, or variables that were deleted or made private
- Renamed exports: functions or classes renamed
For each, record:
- The export name
- The file path
- What changed (old signature vs new signature)
1.5 Use graphSignals.dependencyBreaks when available (v2 path)
If graphSignals.dependencyBreaks is provided AND non-empty:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 138 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 96c70fbe1e61
cross-file-impact is an agent published in the GitHub repository andyzengmath/soliton (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,456 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
cross-file-impact compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cross-file-impactandyzengmath/soliton | Agent | 1 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerarch3rPro/ark-space | Agent | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| parallel-revieweroliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix | Agent | 573 | yesterday | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| data-engineertestdouble/han | Agent | 339 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 216 | Claude Code |
| plan-synthesizertestdouble/han | Agent | 339 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 159 | Claude Code |
| discussion-facilitatortestdouble/han | Agent | 339 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 160 | Claude Code |
| edge-case-explorertestdouble/han | Agent | 339 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 135 | Claude Code |