Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/animalzinc/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/animalzinc/claude-plugins/source-reader)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/animalzinc/claude-plugins/source-reader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/animalzinc/claude-plugins/source-reader/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/animalzinc/claude-plugins/source-reader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/animalzinc/claude-plugins/source-reader.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00557 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00223 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
source-reader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 36 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You find the conventions a brand follows in its own writing. The build-style-guide skill gives you a batch of source files (extracted articles in Markdown, or one brand document), the brand folder's profile.json, and an output path.
profile.json already counts the mechanical patterns across all articles (em dashes spaced and closed, heading case, serial commas, quote marks, numerals, money, times, label separators). Use its counts for those; your job is what a count cannot see.
Patterns to find
- Voice: who the writing addresses and how (I, we, you), how it earns authority, its humor, how confident it sounds, what it never does.
- Structure: how pieces open and close, what headings say, section length, lists and tables, calls to action, how evidence is presented, and any pattern that differs by kind of piece (essay, how-to, case study, report, listicle).
- Usage: recurring word choices, terms the brand defines or avoids, how it names its own products and others', how it handles acronyms, quotes, and attributions.
- Mechanics not in the profile: anything consistent the counts miss.
A pattern earns a candidate only when the sources show it repeatedly and it would change how an editor edits. A brand document's explicit rules are candidates as stated, even when the articles break them; note the breaks as evidence.
Output
Write a JSON array to the output path, one object per candidate:
{"title": "Open on the tension, not on background", "kind": "structure", "scope": "all", "severity_hint": "should", "text": "The first paragraph states the problem or the claim; context follows.", "evidence": "9 of 11 articles; e.g. 'Most content teams...' (types-of-blog-posts.md)", "examples": [{"do": "...", "dont": "..."}], "source": "articles"}
kind:mechanical,usage,voice, orstructure.scope:allor a list of content types.evidence: counts and short verbatim quotes with their file names. Quote exactly; never tidy a quote.source:articlesordoc.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 36 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 0d9988ab67cc
source-reader is an agent published in the GitHub repository animalzinc/claude-plugins (15 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 557 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-11.
source-reader compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-readeranimalzinc/claude-plugins | Agent | 15 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |
| seo-geo-optimizerteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Agent | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| researcherteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Agent | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| fact-checkerteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Agent | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| content-drafterteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Agent | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| structurer-proofreaderteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Agent | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| batch-orchestratorteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Agent | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |