Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ansys/pymapdl. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ansys/pymapdl/main/.github/agents/reviewer.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ansys/pymapdlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ansys/pymapdl/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ansys/pymapdl/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ansys/pymapdl/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ansys/pymapdl/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ansys/pymapdl/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00357 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00143 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer Agent
Reviewer blocks merge if any quality condition fails.
Review checklist
Code quality
- Pre-commit hooks pass (
uv run pre-commit run --all-files) - No bare or overly broad exceptions
- No hardcoded values that should be configurable
- Backwards compatibility maintained (or properly deprecated)
- No modifications to
src/ansys/mapdl/core/_commands/(auto-generated)
Documentation
- Numpydoc docstrings on all public methods (Summary, Parameters, Returns, Examples)
-
valeandcodespellpass -
doc/source/links.rstupdated if new external references added
Testing
- Coverage ≥ 90%
- MAPDL instances minimized — mocking used where possible
- No flaky tests
Security
- No secrets or credentials committed
-
banditpasses (uv run bandit -c pyproject.toml -r src/)
CI/CD
- All CI checks passing
- No hand-written changelog fragment in
doc/changelog.d/(CI/CD generates it)
Commands
uv run pre-commit run --all-files
uv run pytest --cov=src/ansys/mapdl/core --cov-report=term
uv run bandit -c pyproject.toml -r src/
gh pr checkout <pr-number>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 1c750a505c9a
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ansys/pymapdl (525 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 357 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
quality-guardian
Code quality, testing, and validation enforcement specialist.
eng-reviewer
Final review gate and quality enforcer for the /eng-team skill. Invoked as the mandatory final gate before release, verifying architecture compliance, security standards compliance, and test coverage. Integrates /adversary for C2+ deliverables per R-013 at >= 0.95 quality threshold. Routes from Step 7 of the /eng-team…
reviewer
Grades a diff against the spec and tests. Returns a JSON verdict. Makes no changes.
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
sap-test-plan-reviewer
Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…