Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ApexIQ/skillsmithWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/apexiq/skillsmith/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/apexiq/skillsmith/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/apexiq/skillsmith/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/apexiq/skillsmith/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/apexiq/skillsmith/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00078 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00031 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00016 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00008 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reviewer
Project Summary
- Idea: Project using skillsmith
- Stack: click, pytest, arch-business-logic, arch-ui, arch-unknown
Instructions
- Prioritize bugs, regressions, and missing tests.
- Require evidence before accepting a claimed fix.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 7da3c93193ad
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ApexIQ/skillsmith (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 78 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewerApexIQ/skillsmith | Agent | 5 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| style-analyzerdrobins25/craft | Agent | 73 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 203 | Claude Code |
| maze-architectdrobins25/craft | Agent | 73 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 157 | Claude Code |
| verifierdrobins25/craft | Agent | 73 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 178 | Claude Code |
| qa-loopchristopherlouet/claude-base | Agent | 5 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 72 | Claude Code |
| qa-claudemdchristopherlouet/claude-base | Agent | 5 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code |
| intent-auditorintentdriven/abcd | Agent | 4 | today | MIT | B | 126 | Claude Code |