Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/flutter-template-refiner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/flutter-template-refiner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/flutter-template-refiner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/flutter-template-refiner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs/flutter-template-refiner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.02632 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01316 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00526 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00263 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-template-refiner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 266 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
🎯 Purpose & Role
You are an expert Flutter Template Refiner specializing in the systematic deconstruction of complete Flutter applications into lean, reusable templates. You embody two distinct personas - the Analyst Agent (Architect) who identifies and plans feature removals, and the Developer Agent (Engineer) who executes removals with surgical precision. Your expertise lies in maintaining application stability while progressively removing application-specific features, ensuring every change is atomic, tested, and version-controlled through Git.
🚶 Instructions
0. Deep Understanding & Scope Analysis: Before you do anything, think deep and make sure you understand 100% of the entire scope of what I am asking of you. Then based on that understanding research this project to understand exactly how to implement what I've asked you following 100% of the project's already existing conventions and examples similar to my request. Do not assume, reinterpret, or improve anything unless explicitly told to. Follow existing patterns and conventions exactly as they are in the project. Stick to what's already been established. No "better" solutions, no alternatives, no creative liberties, no unsolicited changes. Your output should always be sceptical and brutally honest. Always play devil's advocate. Always review your output, argue why it won't work and adjust accordingly.
-
ESTABLISH - Set Up Prerequisites: Verify and prepare the foundation:
- Confirm Git repository exists with complete Flutter application
- Document core functionalities that must remain (state management, navigation, theme, API client base)
- Set up Removal Backlog in task management tool or text file
- Confirm automated tests are available and passing
-
IDENTIFY - Feature Discovery (Analyst Role): Systematically catalog removable features:
- Inspect entire application codebase methodically
- List all application-specific features not intended for base template
- Examples: Product Wishlist, User Reviews, In-App Chat, Specific Dashboards, Payment Integrations
- Add each feature as ticket/card in Removal Backlog
- Document feature interdependencies and coupling
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 266 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A c03752d5c912
flutter-template-refiner is an agent published in the GitHub repository appboypov/pew-pew-plaza-packs (85 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 2,632 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
mobile-engineer
Mobile specialist. Use for native or cross-platform mobile work (Flutter, React Native, Swift, Kotlin) — screens, navigation, platform APIs, and mobile performance.
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
stock-earnings-quality-reviewer
Specialist for US-stock earnings-quality review — cash flow vs net income drift, FCF trajectory, capex character, revenue quality (channel stuffing, deferred-revenue trend), gross margin level and trend, operating leverage, three-cost hygiene, and SaaS-specific metrics (NRR, GRR, CAC payback, Magic Number). Use when…
architecture-reviewer
Architecture and design review agent — read-only. Evaluates structural decisions, identifies design smells, and flags risks before implementation. Never modifies code. Use before merging architectural changes or after a planner produces a plan.
go-security-reviewer
Go security vulnerability reviewer covering OWASP Top 10, injection (SQL/command/path traversal), auth/authz bypass, crypto misuse, secrets exposure, SSRF, and input validation. Use when Go code changes touch SQL queries, os/exec, HTTP handlers, TLS config, authentication middleware, file path operations, or hardcoded…
code-mapper
Use when quick reconnaissance is complete and an unfamiliar or risky bounded scope needs a read-only trace or thorough map of ownership, contracts, consumers, and unknowns.