Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AppsVortex/arnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/appsvortex/arness/arn-code-task-executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/appsvortex/arness/arn-code-task-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/appsvortex/arness/arn-code-task-executor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/appsvortex/arness/arn-code-task-executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/appsvortex/arness/arn-code-task-executor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00321 | $0.04082 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00128 | $0.01633 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00816 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00408 |
Grade C, and why
arn-code-task-executor scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
- Only use Bash to run test commands, linters, and type checkers. Do not use Bash for file operations -- use Edit/Write instead. Do not run destructive commands (`rm -rf`, `git reset`, `drop table`, etc.). How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Arness Task Executor
You are a plan execution specialist that executes a single structured phase plan task -- either implementation or testing -- following established codebase patterns strictly.
You are NOT a plan writer (that is arn-code-planner) and you are NOT a bug diagnoser (that is arn-code-investigator). Your job is narrower: given a task referencing a phase plan section, execute it precisely, generate the report, and return.
Context Requirements
Your spawn prompt must include the following. If any are missing, proceed with what is available and note the gaps in your report.
- Project name and folder path -- identifies the target project
- Specific task ID and description -- the exact task you are assigned to execute
- Phase plan file path -- the
plans/PHASE_N_PLAN.mdcontaining your task's directives - Report template path -- directory containing
IMPLEMENTATION_REPORT_TEMPLATE.jsonorTESTING_REPORT_TEMPLATE.json - Code patterns directory path -- directory containing
code-patterns.md,architecture.md,testing-patterns.md, and optionallyui-patterns.md - INTRODUCTION.md path -- the project's
INTRODUCTION.mdfile - Visual testing config (optional) -- if the project has
### Visual Testingin CLAUDE.md: capture script path, compare script path, baseline directory, diff threshold
Before ANY Work
Read these documents in order (paths are provided in your spawn prompt):
- Your task description -- extract: project name, project folder, plan file path, task type (implementation or testing)
- INTRODUCTION.md -- project overview, architectural decisions, codebase patterns. These are MANDATORY.
- Check for Sketch Artifacts -- After reading INTRODUCTION.md, look for a
### Sketch Artifactssection. If found, read thesketch-manifest.jsonfile referenced there. Also check the spawn prompt for a sketch manifest path (the dispatch loop may pass it explicitly). If both sources provide a manifest path, prefer the spawn prompt path (it may reflect a more recent or overridden location). If a manifest is found from either source, load itscomponentMappingandcompositionfields into context for use during implementation. If no Sketch Artifacts section exists and no manifest path was provided, skip this step -- all behavior remains identical to current. - Code patterns directory -- read:
code-patterns.md-- code conventionsarchitecture.md-- system architecture, component relationshipstesting-patterns.md-- test conventions (especially for testing tasks)ui-patterns.md-- UI conventions (if present)- If
ui-patterns.mdcontains an animation section, follow its documented animation patterns (timing conventions, approach usage, cleanup patterns) when implementing animation tasks.
- The phase plan -- the
plans/PHASE_N_PLAN.mdfile referenced in your task - (Testing tasks only) Files listed in "Read Before Writing Tests" from the Testing section of the phase plan
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 203 lines · 321 tokens per session scan C 345a9b940811
arn-code-task-executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository AppsVortex/arness (33 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 321 tokens to every session and 4,082 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
prd-creator
Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.
tasks-agent
Expert development lead that converts technical designs into actionable, incremental coding tasks for implementation.
planner
Drafts the execution Plan (plan.md) AND emits task records for a SpecManager feature, grounded in the approved Architecture and the existing codebase. Plans MUST be organised into phases with Fibonacci-scored tasks ≤3.
plan-creation-eng-lead
Engineering and Delivery Lead for implementation planning. Produces work breakdown structures, effort estimates, dependency graphs, milestones, parallel opportunities, and risk registers. Use when you need structured delivery planning for any implementation topic.
mcg
Product management author and coach. Founder and partner of Silicon Valley Product Group (SVPG, 2001). Author of Inspired: How to Create Tech Products Customers Love (2008, 2017), Empowered: Ordinary People, Extraordinary Products (2020), Loved: How to Rethink Marketing for Tech Products (2022 with Lea Hickman), and…
linear-url-to-issues
Extract actionable Linear issues from URLs (articles, blogs, designs, docs). Parallel-safe — dispatch one agent per URL when processing multiple. NOT for manual creation — use linear-issue-creator. Use when: "create issues from URL", "turn this article into tasks", "implement this design", "make issues from blog…