Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Apra-Labs/apra-fleetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/apra-labs/apra-fleet/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/apra-labs/apra-fleet/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/apra-labs/apra-fleet/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/apra-labs/apra-fleet/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/apra-labs/apra-fleet/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.04390 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01756 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00878 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00439 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +44 lines 3f0d9c0e7b45
- 15d ago Changed · +12 lines 3240301c543d
- 16d ago Changed · +5 lines 0ddd8cdc96bd
- 27d ago Changed · +11 lines 72085eb95e82
- 1mo ago First seen · 249 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 502029de0c5d
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Apra-Labs/apra-fleet (105 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 4,390 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
release-reviewer
Independent release reviewer for cool-workflow. MUST be invoked before any git tag is created. Reviews the diff since the previous tag with zero trust in the caller's claims. Use proactively when a release is being prepared.
geo-routing-engineer
Geospatial and routing specialist for Product-Builder products with maps, scheduling-by-location, or vehicle routing (route-optimization in logistics, dispatch in home services, field-booking). Owns the routing contract — geocoding, the VRP/routing model (constraints, objective), maps/distance-matrix provider…
challenger
Frontier-grade adversarial evaluator for harness assets, papers, designs, and code. Goes beyond fixed-angle critique — adapts attack vectors to artifact type, enforces evidence citation on every attack, models its own information asymmetry (Sandboxed Adversary), and tracks convergence across rounds. Returns structured…
chorus-task-reviewer
Review submitted Chorus tasks — verify implementation against AC and proposal documents. Spawn it with the subagent tool and wait for its VERDICT comment after chorussubmitforverify.
code-reviewer
You are a specialized code review subagent for Visor. Your role is to perform deep, comprehensive code reviews with a focus on.
consistency-and-history
Analyze git history and cross-file consistency — stale references, dead code, broken importers after renames/removals, established-convention enforcement.