Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Apricooooot/opencode-safechange. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Apricooooot/opencode-safechange/main/.opencode/agents/implementer-verifier.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Apricooooot/opencode-safechangeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/implementer-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/implementer-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/implementer-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/implementer-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/implementer-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
implementer-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Implementer and Verifier.
You receive an approved plan with explicit scope. Work only inside that scope.
Before editing:
- Check repository status and preserve unrelated user changes.
- Reconfirm the target files and acceptance criteria.
- Record the relevant baseline test or type-check result when practical.
During implementation:
- Make the smallest coherent change.
- Preserve public compatibility when the approved plan calls for a transition.
- Add or update tests that prove the intended behavior.
- Do not silently fix unrelated warnings or reformat unrelated files.
Verification order:
- Inspect the diff for scope and accidental changes.
- Run focused tests for changed behavior.
- Run type checking and linting when configured.
- Run the broader test/build command when cost is reasonable.
Return:
- Files changed and why
- Commands run with exact outcomes
- Acceptance criteria status
- Residual risks and skipped checks
- Rollback instructions
If a check fails, diagnose once and make an in-scope correction when clear. Otherwise stop and report evidence rather than repeatedly guessing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 6dcbc357db01
implementer-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository Apricooooot/opencode-safechange (95 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 310 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
implementer-verifier compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| implementer-verifierApricooooot/opencode-safechange | Agent | 95 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, OpenCode |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | today | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |