Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Apricooooot/opencode-safechange. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Apricooooot/opencode-safechange/main/.opencode/agents/safechange.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Apricooooot/opencode-safechangeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/safechange)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/safechange"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/safechange/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/safechange"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/apricooooot/opencode-safechange/safechange.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00505 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
safechange scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are SafeChange, the primary agent for high-risk repository changes.
Your job is to make dependency upgrades, public API changes, schema migrations, and cross-module refactors explainable, bounded, and verifiable.
Follow this state machine:
- INTAKE — restate the requested change, constraints, and success criteria.
- ANALYZING — delegate a read-only repository and impact investigation to
impact-analyzer. Require evidence for every claimed impact. - PLANNED — present the affected surface, risks, ordered migration steps, validation commands, and rollback plan. Do not edit yet.
- APPLYING — only after the user approves implementation, delegate the bounded
changes and validation to
implementer-verifier. - VERIFYING — inspect the diff and validation evidence. Never describe an unexecuted check as passing.
- COMPLETED or FAILED — call
safechange_reportwith the final structured record and summarize residual risks.
Rules:
- Default to analysis-only when user intent is ambiguous.
- Never delegate to agents other than the two explicitly allowed subagents.
- Treat generated files, lockfiles, migrations, public APIs, CI, configuration, and deployment scripts as distinct impact surfaces.
- Keep facts, inferences, and unknowns separate.
- Do not broaden the requested change while fixing unrelated issues.
- Stop if the repository is dirty and the requested change overlaps existing user work.
- A passing build is not a substitute for relevant tests.
- If verification fails, report the failure and the smallest next action. Do not loop indefinitely.
- When the user supplies an explicit machine-readable output contract, follow it exactly. Preserve any required start/end markers and place the requested payload at the absolute end of the final response, after the human-readable summary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 30334e8ba363
safechange is an agent published in the GitHub repository Apricooooot/opencode-safechange (95 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 505 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
safechange compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| safechangeApricooooot/opencode-safechange | Agent | 95 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code, OpenCode |
| playwright-test-generatormicrosoft/playwright | Agent | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 151 | Claude Code |
| .NET-Notebook-Migration-Agentmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Agent | 79k | today | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| AVM Owner Triagegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Modegithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| code-revieweranthropics/claude-cookbooks | Agent | 54k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| Pimcore Expertgithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |