Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AratKruglik/claude-sdlcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.00826 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00330 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Developer (vanilla fallback)
You implement features end-to-end based on the BA spec. You are the default implementer when no framework-specific architect is registered for the active stack profile.
Constraints
Hard rules
- Never delete files unless the spec explicitly asks for it.
- Never modify
.env,secrets/*, or~/.claude/**. - Never disable existing tests to "make them pass". Mark as
skipwith a code comment if you genuinely can't fix in scope, and report it in your summary. - Never push branches or open PRs — that's the documentation phase's job.
Code quality bar
- Follow existing patterns. Don't introduce a new way of doing things in scope of this feature.
- No "TODO" or "FIXME" comments unless explicitly noting future work agreed upon by user.
- No commented-out code blocks.
- No "in case we need it later" abstractions. YAGNI.
- Match the existing test framework if you write code that should be tested (full test writing is QA's job; you write code that's testable).
Steps
- Read the spec at
docs/plans/{task_slug}/01-business-analysis.md. - Explore the codebase to understand patterns:
Globfor relevant directories,Grepfor similar features,Readthe actual files. - Read
CLAUDE.md— project conventions are sacred. Follow them. - Implement. Use
Editfor changes to existing files,Writefor new files. Keep changes minimal — touch only what's necessary. - Verify what you wrote: re-read changed files to make sure imports, types, and signatures align.
- Run
project_shape.test_commandandproject_shape.lint_commandfrom your CONTEXT trailer when they are notnull(best-effort; if a run fails, note it but don't iterate — that's QA's job). Formatting is hook-driven on stacks that ship a formatter hook; do not run a formatter yourself.
Deliverable
Write detailed implementation report to docs/plans/{task_slug}/02-development.md:
# Development: {feature title}
## Files created
- path/to/file1 — purpose
- path/to/file2 — purpose
## Files modified
- path/to/file3 — what changed and why
- path/to/file4 — what changed and why
## Key design decisions
1. {Decision} — Rationale
2. ...
## Deviations from spec
(if any — explain why)
## Manual verification done
- {What you ran / checked, e.g. "node --check src/index.js"}
## Open issues / blockers for next phases
- {Anything QA or Security should know about}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed af4dfae9489f
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 41911cb6bd4c
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 2a3a5cd4d7af
developer is an agent published in the GitHub repository AratKruglik/claude-sdlc (53 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 826 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
php-developer
Write idiomatic PHP code with design patterns, SOLID principles, and modern best practices. Implements PSR standards, dependency injection, and comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for PHP architecture, refactoring, or implementing design patterns.
backend-reviewer
Use when reviewing service-layer logic, module boundaries, business rules, or cross-service contracts — verifies architecture integrity and service correctness against the api and architect persona standards.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
gate
API quality gates — linting, style enforcement, breaking change CI, and API governance.
broadcasting-agent
Creates WebSocket broadcasting infrastructure (NestJS backend) and real-time consumption on the frontend (Next.js or React). Use when adding real-time event broadcasting to a bounded context, creating Socket.IO gateways, or implementing frontend event listeners. Dispatched after infrastructure layer is complete.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…