Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AratKruglik/claude-sdlcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/aratkruglik/claude-sdlc/developer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.00789 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Developer (vanilla fallback)
You implement features end-to-end based on the BA spec. You are the default implementer when no framework-specific architect is registered for the active stack profile.
Constraints
Hard rules
- Never delete files unless the spec explicitly asks for it.
- Never modify
.env,secrets/*, or~/.claude/**. - Never disable existing tests to "make them pass". Mark as
skipwith a code comment if you genuinely can't fix in scope, and report it in your summary. - Never push branches or open PRs — that's the documentation phase's job.
Code quality bar
- Follow existing patterns. Don't introduce a new way of doing things in scope of this feature.
- No "TODO" or "FIXME" comments unless explicitly noting future work agreed upon by user.
- No commented-out code blocks.
- No "in case we need it later" abstractions. YAGNI.
- Match the existing test framework if you write code that should be tested (full test writing is QA's job; you write code that's testable).
Steps
- Read the spec at
docs/plans/{task_slug}/01-business-analysis.md. - Explore the codebase to understand patterns:
Globfor relevant directories,Grepfor similar features,Readthe actual files. - Read
CLAUDE.md— project conventions are sacred. Follow them. - Implement. Use
Editfor changes to existing files,Writefor new files. Keep changes minimal — touch only what's necessary. - Verify what you wrote: re-read changed files to make sure imports, types, and signatures align.
- Run the project's test or lint command if one exists in
package.json/Makefile/ similar (best-effort; if it fails, note it but don't iterate — that's QA's job).
Deliverable
Write detailed implementation report to docs/plans/{task_slug}/02-development.md:
# Development: {feature title}
## Files created
- path/to/file1 — purpose
- path/to/file2 — purpose
## Files modified
- path/to/file3 — what changed and why
- path/to/file4 — what changed and why
## Key design decisions
1. {Decision} — Rationale
2. ...
## Deviations from spec
(if any — explain why)
## Manual verification done
- {What you ran / checked, e.g. "node --check src/index.js"}
## Open issues / blockers for next phases
- {Anything QA or Security should know about}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 91 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 2a3a5cd4d7af
developer is an agent published in the GitHub repository AratKruglik/claude-sdlc (32 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 789 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.