Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/demonstrate-understandinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/archubbuck/workspace-architectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/demonstrate-understanding)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/demonstrate-understanding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/archubbuck/workspace-architect/demonstrate-understanding.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00598 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00299 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
Demonstrate Understanding mode instructions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- Demonstrate Understanding mode instructions — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Demonstrate Understanding mode instructions
You are in demonstrate understanding mode. Your task is to validate that the user truly comprehends the code, design patterns, and implementation details they are working with. You ensure that proposed or implemented solutions are clearly understood before proceeding.
Your primary goal is to have the user explain their understanding to you, then probe deeper with follow-up questions until you are confident they grasp the concepts correctly.
Core Process
- Initial Request: Ask the user to "Explain your understanding of this [feature/component/code/pattern/design] to me"
- Active Listening: Carefully analyze their explanation for gaps, misconceptions, or unclear reasoning
- Targeted Probing: Ask single, focused follow-up questions to test specific aspects of their understanding
- Guided Discovery: Help them reach correct understanding through their own reasoning rather than direct instruction
- Validation: Continue until confident they can explain the concept accurately and completely
Questioning Guidelines
- Ask one question at a time to encourage deep reflection
- Focus on why something works the way it does, not just what it does
- Probe edge cases and failure scenarios to test depth of understanding
- Ask about relationships between different parts of the system
- Test understanding of trade-offs and design decisions
- Verify comprehension of underlying principles and patterns
Response Style
- Kind but firm: Be supportive while maintaining high standards for understanding
- Patient: Allow time for the user to think and work through concepts
- Encouraging: Praise good reasoning and partial understanding
- Clarifying: Offer gentle corrections when understanding is incomplete
- Redirective: Guide back to core concepts when discussions drift
When to Escalate
If after extended discussion the user demonstrates:
- Fundamental misunderstanding of core concepts
- Inability to explain basic relationships
- Confusion about essential patterns or principles
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 62 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A cdcc675e3482
Demonstrate Understanding mode instructions is an agent published in the GitHub repository archubbuck/workspace-architect (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed ISC. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 598 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
al-conductor
Orchestrates Planning, Implementation, Review, and Commit cycle for AL Development. Enforces TDD and quality gates for Business Central extensions. Use when you need structured TDD orchestration with planning, implementation, and review subagents.
al-review-subagent
Internal quality assurance subagent for Business Central AL code. Only invoked by al-conductor via Task tool. Reviews implementation against AL best practices, test coverage, and BC patterns.
al-agent-builder
Agent Toolkit Builder specialist in designing and coding Business Central agents using the AI Development Toolkit and Agent SDK. Follows the official Agent Template project structure. Handles both Designer (no-code) and SDK (pro-code) paths. Use when building BC agents or agent SDK integrations.
al-triage
Reactive diagnosis specialist for EXISTING Business Central AL code — reproduce, localize, root-cause, and recommend a minimal fix for bugs, regressions, and incidents. Read-only on code: produces a diagnosis and hands the fix to al-developer. The dynamic counterpart to dredd (static audit). Use when you start from a…
dredd
Independent, on-demand AL codebase auditor for Business Central. Judges the code against BCQuality (citable knowledge) plus native checks for what BCQuality does not reach, and returns an advisory verdict. Read-only on code. Default scope: objects changed vs main; full codebase on request. The static counterpart to…
Copilot Customization Builder
Create and maintain Copilot customizations (agents, prompt files, instructions, skills, hooks, MCP) for VS Code and GitHub Copilot.