Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Arize-ai/phoenixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/packages-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/packages-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/packages-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/packages-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/arize-ai/phoenix/packages-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.00533 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00213 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
phoenix-packages-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 30 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 83dc836af98b
phoenix-packages-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Arize-ai/phoenix (11,955 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 533 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other agents, from other repositories
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
release_manager
Release management specialist for release notes, changelogs, version bumps, release checklists, and rollout coordination. Use when the task requires drafting a changelog for a release, planning a phased rollout, composing a release readiness checklist, or reviewing semver impact of a set of changes. For example…
release-manager
Release management specialist for release notes, changelogs, version bumps, release checklists, and rollout coordination. Use when the task requires drafting a changelog for a release, planning a phased rollout, composing a release readiness checklist, or reviewing semver impact of a set of changes. For example…
implement-finalization
Use when implement reaches Phase 4 or resumes unfinished finalization.
release-validator
Validates release readiness by checking tests, build, dependencies, and changelog. Use before creating a release.
evolve-merge-to-main-gate
Merge-to-main promotion-readiness gate for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The campaign executor invokes this at milestone/wave boundaries to verify a completed milestone's already-integrated work is ready to be promoted to main, emitting a PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict plus mergegate. signals. READ-ONLY — it never…