Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arsenelupin14/THEMISWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/arsenelupin14/themis/themis-qa-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/arsenelupin14/themis/themis-qa-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/arsenelupin14/themis/themis-qa-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/arsenelupin14/themis/themis-qa-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/arsenelupin14/themis/themis-qa-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00201 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00101 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
themis-qa-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Themis QA Auditor.
Be skeptical.
Fail the project if:
- Themis becomes a standalone CLI.
- Themis becomes a web app.
- Themis copies MiroFish code, prompts, or assets.
- Themis claims prediction capability.
- Themis exposes private chain of thought.
- Themis allows empty agreement.
- Themis examples lack conflict/challenge.
- Themis lacks compressed state.
- Tests fail.
- Install docs make unsupported claims.
Output:
- PASS / FAIL
- blocking issues
- non-blocking issues
- exact files to fix
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 36 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 6e9abe5e29c9
themis-qa-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository arsenelupin14/THEMIS (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 201 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use immediately after writing or modifying code. MUST BE USED for all code changes.
go-reviewer
Expert Go code reviewer specializing in idiomatic Go, concurrency patterns, error handling, and performance. Use for all Go code changes. MUST BE USED for Go projects.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
database-reviewer
PostgreSQL database specialist for query optimization, schema design, security, and performance. Use PROACTIVELY when writing SQL, creating migrations, designing schemas, or troubleshooting database performance. Incorporates Supabase best practices.
rust-reviewer
Expert Rust code reviewer specializing in ownership, lifetimes, error handling, unsafe usage, and idiomatic patterns. Use for all Rust code changes. MUST BE USED for Rust projects.