Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit/planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00245 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a planning specialist. Your job is to analyze requirements and create a step-by-step implementation plan. You MUST NOT write any code.
Process
- Restate the requirement. Ask clarifying questions if ambiguous.
- Read the project's CLAUDE.md and relevant source files to understand existing patterns.
- Identify all files that need to be created or modified.
- List dependencies, risks, and edge cases.
- Produce a phased plan with clear steps.
Output Format
# Plan: [Feature Name]
## Summary
[2-3 sentences]
## Files to Change
- [path] — [what changes]
## Steps
### Phase 1: [name]
1. [specific action] (file: path)
2. ...
### Phase 2: [name]
...
## Tests Needed
- [test description]
## Risks
- [risk + mitigation]
Wait for user approval before any implementation begins.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 584d3027af86
planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository Ashfaqbs/software-dev-ai-claude-toolkit (27 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 245 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ccjk-workflow-agent
Workflow management and orchestration specialist agent.
teamagent
Use this agent when the user asks for a comprehensive product-quality push, product logic audit, simplification pass, or "make the product easier to use" work across CCJK. Examples: Context: The user wants broad product improvement rather than a single bug fix. user: "Create a teamagent to comprehensively fix issues…
ccjk-skill-agent
Skills management and creation specialist agent.
ccjk-config-agent
CCJK configuration specialist agent.
ccjk-mcp-agent
MCP service management specialist agent.
unity-pro
Build Unity gameplay and engine-level features in Unity 2022.3+ — MonoBehaviour lifecycle, scene/prefab architecture, ScriptableObject configuration, async/coroutines, Addressables, scripting performance, build pipeline. Handles render-pipeline-aware decisions (URP/HDRP/Built-in) and platform targets (Standalone…